Screening Measures of Perinatal Mental Health and Wellbeing in Fathers: A Scoping Review

Vincent Mancini (), Yonatan Ambrosio Lomeli, Thomas P. Nevill, Thomas B. Marsh, Ezra Kneebone and Alka Kothari
Additional contact information
Vincent Mancini: Human Development and Community Wellbeing, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
Yonatan Ambrosio Lomeli: Human Development and Community Wellbeing, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
Thomas P. Nevill: Human Development and Community Wellbeing, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
Thomas B. Marsh: Human Development and Community Wellbeing, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
Ezra Kneebone: Human Development and Community Wellbeing, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
Alka Kothari: Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 7, 1-27

Abstract: Accurately screening fathers for perinatal mental health problems requires well-validated screening instruments that assess the expression of paternal perinatal mental distress. This study aimed to identify and describe the psychometric properties of perinatal mental health screening instruments administered to paternal cohorts within the past two decades. A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework and is reported in line with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search of Embase, PsycINFO, Medline, and ProQuest databases identified peer-reviewed literature published within the past 20 years that implemented a screening instrument for fathers’ perinatal mental health within the first 12 months of their child’s birth. Twenty-eight instruments used to screen fathers’ perinatal mental health were identified across 36 studies. The instruments most frequently assessed symptoms of depression. Only five were explicitly developed for fathers and while these instruments produced promising results, further evaluation is necessary before they can be considered a superior screening method compared to existing instruments.

Keywords: fathers; perinatal mental health; screening; instrument; assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/1126/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/1126/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:1126-:d:1703092

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().