Emerging Contaminants in Source and Finished Drinking Waters Across Minnesota (U.S.) and Potential Health Implications

Sarah M. Elliott (), Aliesha L. Krall, Jane R. de Lambert, Maya D. Gilchrist and Stephen W. Robertson
Additional contact information
Sarah M. Elliott: U.S. Geological Survey, 2280 Woodale Drive, Mounds View, MN 55112, USA
Aliesha L. Krall: U.S. Geological Survey, 2280 Woodale Drive, Mounds View, MN 55112, USA
Jane R. de Lambert: Minnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55155, USA
Maya D. Gilchrist: Minnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55155, USA
Stephen W. Robertson: Minnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55155, USA

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 7, 1-23

Abstract: Relatively little data exist regarding the presence of unregulated contaminants in drinking waters. We sampled source and finished drinking water from 98 community water supply systems throughout Minnesota (U.S.). Facilities were grouped into four networks based on water source and influences from anthropogenic activities. Measured contaminants were dependent on network and included some combination of pesticides, pharmaceuticals, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), benzotriazoles, hormones, wastewater indicators, and illicit drugs. Overall, the number of contaminants detected in samples ranged from 0 to 35 and concentrations ranged from 0.38 ng/L (progesterone) to 47,500 ng/L (bromoform). Fewer contaminants and lower concentrations were detected in finished water samples, compared to source waters. Significantly ( p < 0.05) more PFAS and pesticides and higher sample total concentrations were observed in wells designated as vulnerable to contamination. To estimate potential human-health risk from exposure in drinking water, concentrations were compared against bioactivity information from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ToxCast database and state-based guidance values, when available. Although comparisons could be made for relatively few contaminants, concentrations in finished waters were at least an order of magnitude lower than screening thresholds. Results from this study were used to inform enhancement of the Minnesota Department of Health’s drinking water protection program.

Keywords: pharmaceuticals; PFAS; pesticides; surface water; groundwater; public water supply; human health (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/976/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/976/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:976-:d:1683705

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().