Assessment of Lead Exposure Risk in Locksmiths

Vladislav Kondrashov, Joseph L. McQuirter, Melba Miller and Stephen J. Rothenberg
Additional contact information
Vladislav Kondrashov: Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (J.L.M.), and Anaesthesiology (S.J.R. V.K.), Clinical Research Center (MM), Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Sciences, Los Angeles, California, USA
Joseph L. McQuirter: Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (J.L.M.), and Anaesthesiology (S.J.R. V.K.), Clinical Research Center (MM), Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Sciences, Los Angeles, California, USA
Melba Miller: Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (J.L.M.), and Anaesthesiology (S.J.R. V.K.), Clinical Research Center (MM), Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Sciences, Los Angeles, California, USA
Stephen J. Rothenberg: Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (J.L.M.), and Anaesthesiology (S.J.R. V.K.), Clinical Research Center (MM), Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Sciences, Los Angeles, California, USA

IJERPH, 2005, vol. 2, issue 1, 1-6

Abstract: Exposure to lead has been well recognized in a number of work environments, but little is known about lead exposure associated with machining brass keys containing lead. The brass that is widely used for key manufacturing usually contains 1.5% - 2.5 % of lead. Six (6) licensed locksmiths and 6 case-matched controls successfully completed the pilot study to assess the prevalence of increased body lead burden of professional locksmiths. We measured both Blood Lead (atomic absorption spectrometry), bone-lead (KXRF) and had each subject complete a health and lead exposure risk questionnaire. One locksmith had not cut keys during the past two years, therefore this subject and case-matched control was excluded from the blood lead analysis only. The average blood-lead concentration (+SEM) for the 5 paired subjects was 3.1 (± 0.4) ?g /dL and 2.2 (± 0.3) ?g /dL for controls. Bone measurements, including all 6 paired subjects, showed tibia lead concentration (+SEM) for locksmiths and controls was 27.8 (± 2.3) ?g /g and 13.7 (± 3.3) ?g /g, respectively; average calcaneus lead concentration for locksmiths and controls was 31.9 (± 3.7) ?g /g and 22.6 (± 4.1) ?g /g, respectively: The t-test shows a significantly higher tibia lead (p 0.10). Given that the mean tibia bone lead concentration was 13.1?g/g higher in locksmiths than in their matched controls, this average difference in the two groups would translate to an OR of increased hypertension in locksmiths of between 1.1 and 2.3, based on the published literature. Even with the very small number of subjects participating in this pilot study, we were able to demonstrate that locksmiths had significantly higher current exposure to lead (blood lead concentration) and significantly higher past exposure to lead (tibia lead concentration) than their age, sex and ethnically matched controls. Additional research is needed to fully identify the prevalence and associated risk factors for occupational exposure of lead in this previously understudied profession.

Keywords: lead; elevated blood lead; lead poisoning; occupational health; brass keys (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/2/1/164/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/2/1/164/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:2:y:2005:i:1:p:164-169:d:2726

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().