A Summary Catalogue of Microbial Drinking Water Tests for Low and Medium Resource Settings

Robert Bain, Jamie Bartram, Mark Elliott, Robert Matthews, Lanakila McMahan, Rosalind Tung, Patty Chuang and Stephen Gundry
Additional contact information
Robert Bain: Water and Health Research Centre/Merchant Venturers Building, University of Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK
Jamie Bartram: The Water Institute at UNC/University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
Mark Elliott: The Water Institute at UNC/University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
Robert Matthews: Water and Health Research Centre/Merchant Venturers Building, University of Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK
Lanakila McMahan: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, 33199, USA
Rosalind Tung: Water and Health Research Centre/Merchant Venturers Building, University of Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK
Patty Chuang: The Water Institute at UNC/University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
Stephen Gundry: Water and Health Research Centre/Merchant Venturers Building, University of Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK

IJERPH, 2012, vol. 9, issue 5, 1-17

Abstract: Microbial drinking-water quality testing plays an essential role in measures to protect public health. However, such testing remains a significant challenge where resources are limited. With a wide variety of tests available, researchers and practitioners have expressed difficulties in selecting the most appropriate test(s) for a particular budget, application and setting. To assist the selection process we identified the characteristics associated with low and medium resource settings and we specified the basic information that is needed for different forms of water quality monitoring. We then searched for available faecal indicator bacteria tests and collated this information. In total 44 tests have been identified, 18 of which yield a presence/absence result and 26 of which provide enumeration of bacterial concentration. The suitability of each test is assessed for use in the three settings. The cost per test was found to vary from $0.60 to $5.00 for a presence/absence test and from $0.50 to $7.50 for a quantitative format, though it is likely to be only a small component of the overall costs of testing. This article presents the first comprehensive catalogue of the characteristics of available and emerging low-cost tests for faecal indicator bacteria. It will be of value to organizations responsible for monitoring national water quality, water service providers, researchers and policy makers in selecting water quality tests appropriate for a given setting and application.

Keywords: drinking-water quality; safe water; microbial water testing; faecal indicator bacteria; Escherichia coli; coliform test; H 2 S test (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/5/1609/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/5/1609/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:5:p:1609-1625:d:17543

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().