Identification of the Appropriate Boundary Size to Use When Measuring the Food Retail Environment Surrounding Schools
Laura Seliske,
William Pickett,
Andrei Rosu and
Ian Janssen
Additional contact information
Laura Seliske: Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
William Pickett: Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
Andrei Rosu: School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, 28 Division St., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
Ian Janssen: Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
IJERPH, 2012, vol. 9, issue 8, 1-13
Abstract:
This study included 6,971 students in grades 9 and 10 (ages 13 to 16 years) from 158 schools who participated in the 2009/2010 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study. Students provided information on where they typically ate lunch. The number of food retailers was obtained for six road network buffer sizes (500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,000, and 5,000 meters) surrounding schools. Associations between the presence of food retailers near schools and students’ lunchtime eating behaviours were examined using multilevel logistic regression. Comparisons of model fit statistics indicated that the 1,000 m buffer provided the best fit. At this distance, students with ?3 food retailers near their schools had a 3.42 times greater relative odds (95% CI: 2.12–5.52) of eating their lunchtime meal at a food retailer compared to students with no nearby food retailers. Students who had ?2 food retailers within 750 m of their schools had a 2.74 times greater relative odds (95% CI: 1.75–4.29), while those who had ?1 food retailer within 500 m of their schools had 2.27 times greater relative odds of eating at food retailer (95% CI: 1.46–3.52) compared to those with no nearby food retailers. For distances greater than 1,000 m, no consistent relationships were found.
Keywords: built environment; youth; schools; geographic information systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/8/2715/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/8/2715/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:8:p:2715-2727:d:19174
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().