Efficient Asset Allocation: Application of Game Theory-Based Model for Superior Performance

Mirza Sikalo, Almira Arnaut-Berilo and Azra Zaimovic
Additional contact information
Mirza Sikalo: School of Economics and Business, University of Sarajevo, Trg Oslobodjenja—Alija Izetbegovic 1, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Almira Arnaut-Berilo: School of Economics and Business, University of Sarajevo, Trg Oslobodjenja—Alija Izetbegovic 1, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Azra Zaimovic: School of Economics and Business, University of Sarajevo, Trg Oslobodjenja—Alija Izetbegovic 1, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

IJFS, 2022, vol. 10, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: In this paper, we compared the models for selecting the optimal portfolio based on different risk measures to identify the periods in which some of the risk measures dominated over others. For decades, the best known return-risk model has been Markowitz’s mean-variance model. Based on the criticism of the classical Markowitz model, a whole series of risk measures and models for selecting the optimal portfolio have been developed, which are divided into two groups: symmetrical and downside risk measures. Based on the tools provided by game theory, we presented a minimax model for selecting the optimal portfolio based on the maximum loss as a measure of risk. Recent research has shown the adequacy of the application of this risk measure and its dominance concerning variance in certain circumstances. Theoretically, the model based on maximum loss as a measure of risk relies on a much smaller number of assumptions that must be satisfied. In the empirical part of the paper, we analyzed the real return performance, structure, correlation, stability, and predictive efficiency of the model based on maximum loss return as a measure of risk and compared it with the other famous models to determine whether the maximum loss-based risk measure model is more suitable for use in certain circumstances than conventional return-risk models. We compared portfolios created based on different models over the period of 2000–2020 from a selected sample of stocks that are components of the STOXX Europe 600 index, which covers 90% of the free market capitalization in the European capital market. The observed period included 3 bear market periods, including the period of market decline during the COVID-19 crisis. Our analysis showed that there was no significant difference in portfolio returns depending on the selected model using the “buy-and-hold” strategy, but there were crisis periods. The results showed a significantly higher stability of portfolios selected on the criterion of minimizing the maximum loss than others. In periods of market decline, this portfolio achieved the best performance and had a shorter recovery period than others. This allowed superior use of the minimax model at least for investors with a pronounced risk aversion.

Keywords: portfolio risk; portfolio diversification; portfolio optimization; game theory; COVID-19 crisis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F2 F3 F41 F42 G1 G2 G3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/10/1/20/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/10/1/20/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:20-:d:767153

Access Statistics for this article

IJFS is currently edited by Ms. Hannah Lu

More articles in IJFS from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().