A Fusion of Statistical and Machine Learning Methods: GARCH-XGBoost for Improved Volatility Modelling of the JSE Top40 Index

Israel Maingo, Thakhani Ravele () and Caston Sigauke
Additional contact information
Israel Maingo: Department of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africa
Thakhani Ravele: Department of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africa
Caston Sigauke: Department of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africa

IJFS, 2025, vol. 13, issue 3, 1-30

Abstract: Volatility modelling is a key feature of financial risk management, portfolio optimisation, and forecasting, particularly for market indices such as the JSE Top40 Index, which serves as a benchmark for the South African stock market. This study investigates volatility modelling of the JSE Top40 Index log-returns from 2011 to 2025 using a hybrid approach that integrates statistical and machine learning techniques through a two-step approach. The ARMA(3,2) model was chosen as the optimal mean model, using the auto.arima() function from the forecast package in R (version 4.4.0). Several alternative variants of GARCH models, including sGARCH(1,1), GJR-GARCH(1,1), and EGARCH(1,1), were fitted under various conditional error distributions (i.e., STD, SSTD, GED, SGED, and GHD). The choice of the model was based on AIC, BIC, HQIC, and LL evaluation criteria, and ARMA(3,2)-EGARCH(1,1) was the best model according to the lowest evaluation criteria. Residual diagnostic results indicated that the model adequately captured autocorrelation, conditional heteroskedasticity, and asymmetry in JSE Top40 log-returns. Volatility persistence was also detected, confirming the persistence attributes of financial volatility. Thereafter, the ARMA(3,2)-EGARCH(1,1) model was coupled with XGBoost using standardised residuals extracted from ARMA(3,2)-EGARCH(1,1) as lagged features. The data was split into training (60%), testing (20%), and calibration (20%) sets. Based on the lowest values of forecast accuracy measures (i.e., MASE, RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and sMAPE), along with prediction intervals and their evaluation metrics (i.e., PICP, PINAW, PICAW, and PINAD), the hybrid model captured residual nonlinearities left by the standalone ARMA(3,2)-EGARCH(1,1) and demonstrated improved forecasting accuracy. The hybrid ARMA(3,2)-EGARCH(1,1)-XGBoost model outperforms the standalone ARMA(3,2)-EGARCH(1,1) model across all forecast accuracy measures. This highlights the robustness and suitability of the hybrid ARMA(3,2)-EGARCH(1,1)-XGBoost model for financial risk management in emerging markets and signifies the strengths of integrating statistical and machine learning methods in financial time series modelling.

Keywords: ARMA(3,2); EGARCH(1,1); forecasting, hybrid model; JSE Top40 index; machine learning; risk management; time series; volatility modelling; XGBoost (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F2 F3 F41 F42 G1 G2 G3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/155/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/155/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:155-:d:1731685

Access Statistics for this article

IJFS is currently edited by Ms. Hannah Lu

More articles in IJFS from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().