More Money, More Ethical Commitment? How Corporate Financial Performance Influences Environmental Social and Governance Practices
Ertz Myriam (),
Gautier George Yao Quenum,
Mouhamadou Moustapha Gueye,
Chourouk Ouerghemmi and
Moussa Sacko
Additional contact information
Ertz Myriam: Canada Research Chair in Technology, Sustainability, Society (Chaire TDS), Department of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada
Gautier George Yao Quenum: Canada Research Chair in Technology, Sustainability, Society (Chaire TDS), Department of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada
Mouhamadou Moustapha Gueye: Canada Research Chair in Technology, Sustainability, Society (Chaire TDS), Department of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada
Chourouk Ouerghemmi: Canada Research Chair in Technology, Sustainability, Society (Chaire TDS), Department of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada
Moussa Sacko: Canada Research Chair in Technology, Sustainability, Society (Chaire TDS), Department of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada
IJFS, 2025, vol. 13, issue 3, 1-20
Abstract:
This article explores the relationship between corporate financial performance (CFP) and commitment to ESG (environmental, social and governance) practices, using a sample of companies listed on the S&P 500 and TSX 60 indices. By employing a linear regression model, the study examines how financial indicators such as Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), return on assets (ROA), Assets and Debt influence ESG scores. The results show that financial indicators such as EBITDA, ROA and Assets are positively associated with increased ability to commit resources to ESG practices, except in some cases like when costs associated with ESG initiatives can reduce the competitiveness and profitability of companies in the short term, where ROA is negatively correlated with the adoption of ESG criteria. Also, with regard to the size of companies, thanks to their greater resources, larger companies are more inclined to adopt ESG criteria. These findings enhance the understanding of financial conditions that enable or constrain ESG adoption and provide managerial insights for strategic resource allocation in the pursuit of sustainability goals.
Keywords: financial performance; ESG criteria; socially responsible investing (SRI); corporate social responsibility (CSR); sustainability; stakeholders (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F2 F3 F41 F42 G1 G2 G3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/159/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/159/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:159-:d:1738172
Access Statistics for this article
IJFS is currently edited by Ms. Hannah Lu
More articles in IJFS from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().