Sectoral Performance and the Government Interventions during COVID-19 Pandemic: Australian Evidence

Nhan Huynh, Dat Nguyen and Anh Dao
Additional contact information
Nhan Huynh: Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Swinburne Business School, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia
Dat Nguyen: Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Swinburne Business School, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia
Anh Dao: Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Swinburne Business School, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia

JRFM, 2021, vol. 14, issue 4, 1-16

Abstract: This study explores the contrasting impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on various industries in Australia. Considering all daily announced information, we analyzed the diverse impacts of COVID-19 on the sectoral stock returns from 26 January to 20 July 2020. Sixteen out of twenty examined stock indices negatively react to the daily rise in COVID-19 confirmed cases. Several actions from the Australian government to control the pandemic are relatively ineffective in boosting the overall financial market; however, some positive interactions are captured in five sectors of industrials, health care, metals and mining, materials, and resources. The result shows that all industries that benefited from government financial assistance are either shielded or less severely affected by the pandemic. While sectors that did not directly receive financial remedies relatively showed no enhancement in their overall performance. Having achieved short-term success in helping the economy, the government recorded an all-time high deficit since 2004 that might eventually lead to adverse effects on the overall economy. The Australian equity market is found to be rationally distinct to the crude oil price risk, while positive correlations between AUD/USD rate and real estate-related sectors are reported.

Keywords: COVID-19; stock market; sectoral performance; Government interventions; Australian evidence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C E F2 F3 G (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/4/178/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/4/178/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:178-:d:534775

Access Statistics for this article

JRFM is currently edited by Ms. Chelthy Cheng

More articles in JRFM from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().