Firm Complexity and the Accuracy of Auditors’ Going Concern Opinions in Emerging Markets: Does Auditor Work Stress Matter?

Safaa Saleh (), Ahmed Diab and Osama Abouelela
Additional contact information
Safaa Saleh: Accounting Department, Faculty of Business, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
Ahmed Diab: Accounting Department, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 12435, Saudi Arabia
Osama Abouelela: Accounting Department, Faculty of Business, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt

JRFM, 2025, vol. 18, issue 3, 1-21

Abstract: This study examines the direct and indirect effects of firm complexity on the accuracy of auditors’ going concern opinion (GCAO), and whether and how auditors’ work stress (AWS) can serve as a mediating variable in such a relationship. We analyzed a sample of 705 firm-year observations from 105 non-financial firms listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange between 2017 and 2023. Binary logistic regression, OLS regression, and path analysis were employed to test the study hypotheses. The results suggested that firm complexity is negatively associated with GCAO accuracy but positively associated with AWS. Furthermore, a negative relationship was observed between AWS and GCAO accuracy. Finally, the analysis revealed that AWS mediates the relationship between firm complexity and GCAO accuracy. The findings remained robust across various sensitivity tests. Policymakers, audit firms, and investors can benefit from the findings, which emphasize the necessity of AWS mitigation techniques to improve GCAO accuracy and ultimately contribute to transparent financial reporting. This study provides unique evidence from a developing country on how firm complexity can indirectly impact the quality of auditors’ judgments.

Keywords: firm complexity; going concern; auditor opinion; auditors’ work stress; Egypt (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C E F2 F3 G (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/108/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/108/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:108-:d:1595701

Access Statistics for this article

JRFM is currently edited by Ms. Chelthy Cheng

More articles in JRFM from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().