The Impact of Eurasian Economic Union Membership on Mutual Trade in Services: What Are the Challenges for Small Economies?

Davit Hakhverdyan, Ruzanna Tadevosyan, Anna Pakhlyan and Svetlana Ratner ()
Additional contact information
Davit Hakhverdyan: AMBERD Research Center, Armenian State University of Economics, Nalbandyan 128, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
Ruzanna Tadevosyan: AMBERD Research Center, Armenian State University of Economics, Nalbandyan 128, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
Anna Pakhlyan: AMBERD Research Center, Armenian State University of Economics, Nalbandyan 128, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
Svetlana Ratner: AMBERD Research Center, Armenian State University of Economics, Nalbandyan 128, Yerevan 0025, Armenia

JRFM, 2025, vol. 18, issue 3, 1-15

Abstract: Despite the fact that a decade has elapsed since the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the impact of the EAEU on the economic development of its member states remains a subject of ongoing debate. This article examines the mutual trade in services between the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries, with the aim of assessing the impact of membership on it. The difference-in-difference model has been applied for impact assessment. The model utilizes data from five EAEU member countries—Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia—capturing periods both before and after their EAEU membership, spanning 17 years in total. The results show that membership in the EAEU has significantly affected the exports of services from Russia and Belarus and has a less significant impact on the exports of services from Kazakhstan to the EAEU. At the same time, it has no significant effect on the exports of services from Kyrgyzstan and Armenia to other EAEU countries. In order to ascertain the challenges that exist, expert surveys among service exporters from Armenia have been conducted. Representatives of companies exporting various services to the EAEU have been selected as experts. The survey results indicate the presence of various barriers, including legal, logistical (for cargo transportation companies), and cultural challenges. These barriers encompass licensing difficulties, technical obstacles related to VAT refunds, a ban on cash payments, and difficulties with financial transfers due to sanctions against Russia. The findings of this research are of practical importance and can serve as a guideline for policymakers in the EAEU.

Keywords: Eurasian Economic Union; economic integration; international trade organizations; services; difference-in-difference model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C E F2 F3 G (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/143/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/143/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:143-:d:1608631

Access Statistics for this article

JRFM is currently edited by Ms. Chelthy Cheng

More articles in JRFM from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().