EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Practical Village Planning Strategy of Different Types of Villages—A Case Study of 38 Villages in Shapingba District, Chongqing

Jing Chen, Cheng Wang, Ruilian Dai, Shuang Xu, Yue Shen and Mengzhu Ji
Additional contact information
Jing Chen: School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Cheng Wang: School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Ruilian Dai: School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Shuang Xu: School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Yue Shen: School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Mengzhu Ji: School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Land, 2021, vol. 10, issue 11, 1-19

Abstract: Practical village planning is not only an important guide for implementing the rural revitalization strategy but also an important support for building a sustainable rural development model. The scientific measurement of rural development potential to effectively identify the future development direction and mode of rural areas is of great significance to realize the implementation of “hierarchical and key points” of village planning. Taking 38 villages in Shapingba District of Chongqing as the study area, this study comprehensively measures the rural development potential from four dimensions: location advantage, resource endowment, economic vitality, and development constraint. Results reveal the following: (1) the spatial distribution pattern of rural development potential in the study area is centered on the central and southern urban development area, gradually decreasing toward the peripheral area. The village development potential tends to be balanced overall, but differences are observed in advantage and development obstacles of villages in the district, and the four sub-dimensions show a large spatial heterogeneity;(2) the 38 administrative villages were divided into four types, namely, core planning area, important planning area, general planning area, and basic control area. Their percentages were 13.16%, 52.63%, 23.68%, and 10.53%, respectively; (3) differentiated planning contents and strategies for different types of areas are adopted to prepare well-detailed and clearly focused village plans to promote sustainable rural development.

Keywords: rural areas; village planning; potential assessment; village classification; planning strategy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1143/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1143/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1143-:d:665973

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1143-:d:665973