Including Condition into Ecological Maps Changes Everything—A Study of Ecological Condition in the Conterminous United States

Kevin B. Knight, Patrick J. Comer, Brian R. Pickard, Doria R. Gordon and Theodore Toombs
Additional contact information
Kevin B. Knight: Wicked Solutions Environmental LLC, Boulder, CO 80304, USA
Patrick J. Comer: NatureServe, Arlington County, VA 22201, USA
Brian R. Pickard: Tetra Tech Inc., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA
Doria R. Gordon: Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY 10001, USA
Theodore Toombs: Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY 10001, USA

Land, 2021, vol. 10, issue 11, 1-20

Abstract: In 2021, the Biden administration signed an executive order to protect 30% of American lands by 2030. Accomplishing this ambitious goal in the U.S. requires understanding the relative contribution of public and private lands toward supporting biodiversity. New approaches are needed because existing approaches focus on quantity of habitat without incorporating quality. To fill this need, we developed a 30 m resolution national habitat condition index (HCI) that integrates quality and quantity measures of habitat. We hypothesized that including an evaluation of the quality of habitat at landscape scales, both in conservation-focused preserves and working lands would provide a better assessment of the value of geographies for conservation. We divided the conterminous U.S. by major land cover type and into natural and cultivated lands and then spatially mapped multiple anthropogenic stressors, proximity to aquatic habitat, and vegetation departure from expected natural disturbance regimes. Each map layer was then scored for site impact and distance decay and combined into a final national index. Field observations providing scored relative ecological conditions were used for HCI calibration and validation at both CONUS and regional scales. Finally, we evaluate lands by management (conservation versus working lands) and ownership (public versus private) testing the value of these lands for conservation. While we found regional differences across CONUS, functional habitat was largely independent of protection status: working lands provide clear habitat and other values. These results are relevant for guiding strategies to achieve the U.S. 30 by 30 goals. Where similar data exist in other countries, analogous modeling could be used to meet their national conservation commitments.

Keywords: landscape ecology; conservation; habitat quality; conservation planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1145/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1145/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1145-:d:666373

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().