Response Characteristics of Soil Erosion to Spatial Conflict in the Production-Living-Ecological Space and Their DrivingMechanism: A Case Study of Dongting Lake Basin in China

Changchang Liu, Chuxiong Deng (), Zhongwu Li and Yaojun Liu
Additional contact information
Changchang Liu: College of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Chuxiong Deng: College of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Zhongwu Li: College of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Yaojun Liu: College of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Land, 2022, vol. 11, issue 10, 1-17

Abstract: Land use conflicts induced by human activities cause accelerated soil erosion. The response of soil erosion to spatial conflict in production-living-ecological space (PLES) is not clearly understood. In this research, models such as PLES spatial conflict, revised universal soil loss equation, bivariate spatial autocorrelation, and an optimal parameter-based geographical detector were used to explore the characteristics and drivers of soil erosion in response to spatial conflict in the PLES of the Dongting Lake watershed. Results show that spatial changes of the PLES first increased and then decreased. Approximately 45% of the area was consistently in moderate or higher conflict levels throughout the study period. The average soil erosion rate showed a decreasing trend for each year except in the period 2000–2005, when moderate erosion increased. The spatial correlation between spatial conflict and soil erosion was found to be in the form of an inverted “U” for the high-high and low-high agglomeration patterns, and a decreasing trend for the high-low ones. Approximately 27% of the area must be traded off between the spatial conflict of the PLES and soil erosion. The influence of GDP and population density was significant. DEM interacted strongly with GDP, NDVI, precipitation, population density, and “return of farmland to forest” policy. Different patterns were formed among the factors through actions such as amplification, mitigation, catalysis, and dependence effects. We propose policy recommendations based on the differences in the driving mechanisms of the respective models.

Keywords: production-living-ecological space; spatial conflict; soil erosion; driving mechanism; Dongting Lake Basin (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1794/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1794/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1794-:d:942250

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().