Performance Comparison of Different Particle Size Distribution Models in the Prediction of Soil Particle Size Characteristics

Hao Zhang, Chong Wang (), Zhengyan Chen, Qingyu Kang, Xiaohua Xu and Tianpeng Gao ()
Additional contact information
Hao Zhang: Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China, The Ministry of Education of China and School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Chong Wang: Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China, The Ministry of Education of China and School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Zhengyan Chen: Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China, The Ministry of Education of China and School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Qingyu Kang: Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China, The Ministry of Education of China and School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Xiaohua Xu: Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China, The Ministry of Education of China and School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Tianpeng Gao: Engineering Center for Pollution Control and Ecological Restoration in Mining of Gansu Province, Lanzhou City University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Land, 2022, vol. 11, issue 11, 1-13

Abstract: Particle size distribution (PSD) is a rich source of information about soil properties, including soil gradation and soil particle size characteristics. This paper compared the PSD prediction ability of three types of mathematical model. We selected nine models that have been proven to accurately predict sample points in previous studies, and we fit 144 pieces of experimental data on 12 texture classes of soil samples from the UNSODA database. We compared the models’ capability for predicting non-sample points, which is important for predicting soil particle size characteristics. Each model’s ability to predict non-sample points of different texture classes of soil was studied using a comprehensive ranking method. The relative differences in the models’ prediction of non-sample points of different texture classes of soil were analyzed using the relative error method. The results showed no considerable correlation between the number of model parameters and the prediction accuracy. For the various texture classes of soil, the Skaggs model and Weipeng model had the highest accuracy in predicting non-sample points, and the Skaggs model had the widest range of application. The Zhongling model and the Weibull model were better in predicting only one texture class of soil, respectively. The Fredlund model, Kolve model, Rosin model, Van Genuchten model and Best model were not as successful as other models. The Weipeng model overestimated the solid particle mass proportion, while the Skaggs model underestimated it when the clay particle content was greater than 20%. Both the Weipeng model and the Skaggs model demonstrated good prediction accuracy when the particle size was within the silt particle size range. The Skaggs model overestimated the particle mass proportion, while the Weipeng model underestimated it when the particle size was within the sand particle size range.

Keywords: soil; particle size distribution model; non-sample points; soil texture classes; prediction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/2068/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/2068/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:2068-:d:975899

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().