Evaluation and Comparison of the Common Land Model and the Community Land Model by Using In Situ Soil Moisture Observations from the Soil Climate Analysis Network

Minzhuo Ou and Shupeng Zhang
Additional contact information
Minzhuo Ou: Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yet-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
Shupeng Zhang: Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yet-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China

Land, 2022, vol. 11, issue 1, 1-25

Abstract: Soil moisture is a key state variable in land surface processes. Since field measurements of soil moisture are generally sparse and remote sensing is limited in terms of observation depth, land surface model simulations are usually used to continuously obtain soil moisture data in time and space. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the performance of models that simulate soil moisture under various land surface conditions. In this work, we evaluated and compared two land surface models, the Common Land Model version 2014 (CoLM2014) and the Community Land Model Version 5 (CLM5), using in situ soil moisture observations from the Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN). The meteorological and soil attribute data used to drive the models were obtained from SCAN station observations, as were the soil moisture data used to validate the simulation results. The validation results revealed that the correlation coefficients between the simulations by CLM5 (0.38) and observations are generally higher than those by CoLM2014 (0.11), especially in shallow soil (0–0.1016 m). The simulation results by CoLM2014 have smaller bias than those by CLM5 . Both models could simulate diurnal and seasonal variations of soil moisture at seven sites, but we found a large bias, which may be due to the two models’ representation of infiltration and lateral flow processes. The bias of the simulated infiltration rate can affect the soil moisture simulation, and the lack of a lateral flow scheme can affect the models’ division of saturated and unsaturated areas within the soil column. The parameterization schemes in land surface models still need to be improved, especially for soil simulations at small scales.

Keywords: soil moisture simulation; parameterization schemes; land surface processes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/126/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/126/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:126-:d:723790

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().