Soil Organic Carbon Isotope Tracing in Sorghum under Ambient CO 2 and Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE)

Steven W. Leavitt, Li Cheng, David G. Williams, Talbot Brooks, Bruce A. Kimball, Paul J. Pinter, Gerard W. Wall, Michael J. Ottman, Allan D. Matthias, Eldor A. Paul, Thomas L. Thompson and Neal R. Adam
Additional contact information
Steven W. Leavitt: Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Li Cheng: Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
David G. Williams: Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
Talbot Brooks: The Geospatial Center, Delta State University, Cleveland, MS 38732, USA
Bruce A. Kimball: U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ 85138, USA
Paul J. Pinter: U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Phoenix, AZ 85044, USA
Gerard W. Wall: U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ 85138, USA
Michael J. Ottman: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Allan D. Matthias: Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Eldor A. Paul: Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Thomas L. Thompson: School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Neal R. Adam: College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, AZ 85019, USA

Land, 2022, vol. 11, issue 2, 1-15

Abstract: As atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, [CO 2Air ], continue their uncontrolled rise, the capacity of soils to accumulate or retain carbon is uncertain. Free-air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) experiments have been conducted to better understand the plant, soil and ecosystem response to elevated [CO 2 ], frequently employing commercial CO 2 that imparts a distinct isotopic signal to the system for tracing carbon. We conducted a FACE experiment in 1998 and 1999, whereby sorghum (C 4 photosynthetic pathway) was grown in four replicates of four treatments using a split-strip plot design: (i) ambient CO 2 /ample water (365 μmol mol −1 , “Control–Wet”), (ii) ambient CO 2 /water stress (“Control–Dry”), (iii) CO 2 -enriched (560 μmol mol −1 , “FACE–Wet”), and (iv) CO 2 -enriched/water stressed (“FACE–Dry”). The stable-carbon isotope composition of the added CO 2 (in FACE treatments) was close to that of free atmosphere background values, so the subsequent similar 13 C-enriched carbon signal photosynthetically fixed by C 4 sorghum plants could be used to trace the fate of carbon in both FACE and control treatments. Measurement of soil organic carbon content (SOC (%) = g C/ g dry soil × 100%) and δ 13 C at three depths (0–15, 15–30, and 30–60 cm) were made on soils from the beginning and end of the two experimental growing seasons. A progressive ca. 0.5‰–1.0‰ δ 13 C increase in the upper soil SOC in all treatments over the course of the experiment indicated common entry of new sorghum carbon into the SOC pools. The 0–15 cm SOC in FACE treatments was 13 C-enriched relative to the Control by ca. 1‰, and according to isotopic mass balance, the fraction of the new sorghum-derived SOC in the Control–Wet treatment at the end of the second season was 8.4%, 14.2% in FACE–Wet, 6.5% in Control–Dry, and 14.2% in FACE–Dry. The net SOC enhancement resulting from CO 2 enrichment was therefore 5.8% (or 2.9% y −1 of experiment) under ample water and 7.7% (3.8% y −1 of experiment) under limited water, which matches the pattern of greater aboveground biomass increase with elevated [CO 2Air ] under the Dry treatment, but no parallel isotopic shifts were found in deeper soils. However, these increased fractions of new carbon in SOC at the end of the experiment do not necessarily mean an increase in total SOC content, because gravimetric measurements of SOC did not reveal a significant increase under elevated [CO 2Air ], at least within the limits of SOC-content error bars. Thus, new carbon gains might be offset by pre-experiment carbon losses. The results demonstrate successful isotopic tracing of carbon from plants to soils in this sorghum FACE experiment showing differences between FACE and Control treatments, which suggest more dynamic cycling of SOC under elevated [CO 2Air ] than in the Control treatment.

Keywords: FACE; sorghum; carbon isotopes; soil carbon; carbon sequestration; CO 2 fertilization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/309/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/309/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:309-:d:753166

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().