Carbon Sequestration by Native Tree Species around the Industrial Areas of Southern Punjab, Pakistan
Muhammad Zubair,
Ghulam Yasin,
Sehrish Khan Qazlbash,
Ahsan Ul Haq,
Akash Jamil,
Muhammad Yaseen,
Shafeeq Ur Rahman () and
Wei Guo ()
Additional contact information
Muhammad Zubair: Department of Forestry and Range Management, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 66000, Pakistan
Ghulam Yasin: Department of Forestry and Range Management, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 66000, Pakistan
Sehrish Khan Qazlbash: Department of Forestry and Range Management, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 66000, Pakistan
Ahsan Ul Haq: Department of Forestry & Range Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
Akash Jamil: Department of Forestry and Range Management, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 66000, Pakistan
Muhammad Yaseen: College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Shafeeq Ur Rahman: School of Environment and Civil Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China
Wei Guo: Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453003, China
Land, 2022, vol. 11, issue 9, 1-12
Abstract:
Industries have been a major culprit in increasing carbonaceous emissions and major contributors to global warming over the past decades. Factories in the urban periphery tend to warm cities more as compared with rural surroundings. Recently, nature-based solutions have been promoted to provide solutions related to climate adaptations and mitigation issues and challenges. Among these solutions, urban trees have proven to be an effective solution to remove air pollutants and mitigate air pollution specifically caused by carbon emissions. This work was designed to assess the role of tree species in mitigating air emissions of carbon around the vicinity of various industrial sites. For this purpose, three different industrial sites (weaving, brick kiln, and cosmetic) were selected to collect data. Selected industrial sites were divided into two areas, i.e., (a) area inside the industry and (b) area outside the industry. The samples were collected from 100 square meters inside the industries and 100 square meters outside the industries. Five different trees species comprised of four replications were selected for sampling. About twenty trees species from inside and outside of the industries were measured, making it 120 trees from all three selected industries for estimating aboveground and belowground biomass, showing their carbon estimation. The results showed that Moringa oleifera depicted overall higher total biomass from both inside (2.58, 0.56, and 4.57 Mg ha −1 ) and outside sites from all three selected industries. In terms of total carbon stock and carbon sequestration inside the industry sites, Syzygium cumini had the most dominant values in the weaving industry (2.82 and 10.32 Mg ha −1 ) and brick kiln (3.78 and 13.5 Mg ha −1 ), while in the cosmetic industry sites, Eucalyptus camaldulensis depicted higher carbon, stock, and sequestration values (7.83 and 28.70 Mg ha −1 ). In comparison, the sites outside the industries’ vicinity depicted overall lower carbon, stock, and sequestration values. The most dominant tree inside came out to be Dalbergia sisso (0.97 and 3.54 Mg ha −1 ) in the weaving industry sites, having higher values of carbon stock and carbon sequestration. Moringa oliefra (1.26 and 4.63) depicted dominant values in brick kiln sites, while in the cosmetic industry, Vachellia nilotica (2.51 and 9.19 Mg ha −1 ) displayed maximum values as compared with other species. The findings regarding belowground biomass and carbon storage indicate that the amount of soil carbon decreased with the increase in depth; higher soil carbon stock values were depicted at a 0–20 cm depth inside and outside the industries. The study concludes that forest tree species present inside and outside the vicinity of various industries have strong potential in mitigating air emissions.
Keywords: air pollution; carbon sequestration; indigenous trees; industry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1577/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1577/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1577-:d:915869
Access Statistics for this article
Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma
More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().