Optimization of Irrigation of Wine Grapes with Brackish Water for Managing Soil Salinization

Vinod Phogat, Tim Pitt, Paul Petrie, Jirka Šimůnek () and Michael Cutting
Additional contact information
Vinod Phogat: Crop Sciences, South Australian Research and Development Institute, GPO Box 397, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Tim Pitt: Crop Sciences, South Australian Research and Development Institute, GPO Box 397, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Paul Petrie: Crop Sciences, South Australian Research and Development Institute, GPO Box 397, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Jirka Šimůnek: Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
Michael Cutting: Murraylands and Riverland Landscape Board, Murray Bridge, SA 5253, Australia

Land, 2023, vol. 12, issue 10, 1-29

Abstract: Water scarcity and quality are critical impediments to sustainable crop production. In this study, HYDRUS-2D was calibrated using field measurements of water contents and salinities in the soil under wine grapes irrigated with river water ( Rw , 0.32 dS/m). The calibrated model was then used to evaluate the impact of (a) four different water qualities ranging from 0.32 ( Rw ) to 3.2 dS/m (brackish water, Gw ) including blended ( Mix ) and monthly alternating ( Alt ) irrigation modes; (b) two rainfall conditions (normal and 20% below normal); and (c) two leaching options (with and without 30 mm spring leaching irrigation) during the 2017–2022 growing seasons. Irrigation water quality greatly impacted root water uptake ( RWU ) by wine grapes and other water balance components. Irrigation with brackish water reduced average RWU by 18.7% compared to river water. Irrigation with blended water or from alternating water sources reduced RWU by 8.8 and 7%, respectively. Relatively small (2.8–8.2%) average annual drainage ( Dr ) in different scenarios produced a very low (0.05–0.16) leaching fraction. Modeling scenarios showed a tremendous impact of water quality on the salts build-up in the soil. The average electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract ( EC e ) increased three times with Gw irrigation compared to Rw (current practices). Blended and alternate irrigation scenarios showed a 21 and 28% reduction in EC e , respectively, compared to Gw . Irrigation water quality substantially impacted site-specific actual basal ( K cb act ) and single ( K c act ) crop coefficients of grapevine. Threshold leaching efficiency estimated in terms of the salt mass leached vs. added ( LE s ; kg/kg) for salinity control ( LE s > 1) was achieved with LFs of 0.07, 0.12, 0.12, and 0.15 for the Rw , Mix , Alt , and Gw irrigations, respectively. Applying annual leaching irrigation (30 mm) before bud burst (spring) in the Mix and Alt with Rw and Gw scenarios was found to be the best strategy for managing irrigation-induced salinity in the root zone, lowering the EC e to levels comparable to irrigation with Rw . Modeling scenarios suggested that judicious use of water resources and continuous root zone monitoring could be key for salinity management under adverse climate and low water allocation conditions.

Keywords: grapevine; water quality; water balance; soil salinity; leaching; crop coefficients; drought seasons rainfall; leaf area index; HYDRUS-2D (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1947/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1947/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1947-:d:1264020

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().