A Life Cycle Assessment of Rice–Rice and Rice–Cowpea Cropping Systems in the West Coast of India

Venkatesh Paramesh, Parveen Kumar (), Ranjan Parajuli, Rosa Francaviglia (), Kallakeri Kannappa Manohara, Vadivel Arunachalam, Trivesh Mayekar and Sulekha Toraskar
Additional contact information
Venkatesh Paramesh: ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Goa Velha 403402, Goa, India
Parveen Kumar: ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Goa Velha 403402, Goa, India
Ranjan Parajuli: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
Rosa Francaviglia: CREA, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, 00184 Rome, Italy
Kallakeri Kannappa Manohara: ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Goa Velha 403402, Goa, India
Vadivel Arunachalam: ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Goa Velha 403402, Goa, India
Trivesh Mayekar: ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Goa Velha 403402, Goa, India
Sulekha Toraskar: ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Goa Velha 403402, Goa, India

Land, 2023, vol. 12, issue 2, 1-14

Abstract: Crop diversification is essential in lowland rice cropping systems to achieve sustainability, improve soil health, and as a climate-resilient practice to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted for the farms in the west-coast region of India to assess the environmental impact of the rice–rice and rice–cowpea cropping systems. The life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) was evaluated in a “cradle-to-gate” perspective. A higher energy consumption was found in the rice–rice system (32,673 vs. 18,197 MJ/ha), while the net energy output was higher in the rice–cowpea system (211,071 vs. 157,409 MJ/ha). Energy consumption was 44% lower in the rice–cowpea system, which was coupled with a higher energy efficiency (11.6 vs. 4.8), attributed to the lower energy consumption and the higher energy output. Further, the results indicated an energy saving potentialin the rice–cowpea system due to the higher use of renewable resources such as farmyard manure. Field emissions, fertilizer production, and fuel consumption were the major contributors to the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in both cropping systems. The total GHG emissions were 81% higher in the rice–rice system (13,894 ± 1329 kg CO 2 eq./ha) than in the rice–cowpea system (7679 ± 719 kg CO 2 eq./ha). The higher GHG emissions in the rice–rice system were largely due to the higher use of fertilizers, diesel fuel, and machinery. Hence, diversifying the winter rice with a cowpea crop and its large-scale adoption on the west coast of India would provide multiple benefits in decreasing the environmental impact and improving the energy efficiency to achieve sustainability and climate resilience in rice-based cropping systems.

Keywords: greenhouse gases emissions; environmental impact assessment; life cycle inventory; lowland ecosystem; rice–cowpea systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/502/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/502/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:502-:d:1072182

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().