Do the High-Tech Industrial Development Zones Foster Urban Innovation? A Case Study of China
Qixuan Wang,
Jie Ren,
Simin Yan,
Zhan Cao and
Yao Cheng ()
Additional contact information
Qixuan Wang: College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Jie Ren: College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Simin Yan: Institute of Geography, Faculty of Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Zhan Cao: College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Yao Cheng: College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Land, 2023, vol. 12, issue 4, 1-18
Abstract:
China’s high-tech industrial development zones (HIDZs) is a key “place-based” policy targeting national innovation-driven development. Despite the extensive research on HIDZs, it remains unclear whether and to what extent the policy has fostered cities’ innovation output and quality. Basing our research on panel data of Chinese cities from 2001 to 2019, we employed the PSM-DID model to examine the impact of HIDZs policy on their host cities’ innovation output and quality. The empirical results show that: (1) In general, the establishment of HIDZs has a more significant positive effect on fostering urban innovation output compared to its role in promoting urban innovation quality. However, (2) the effect on urban innovation output and quality varies across different cities. For cities with more advantageous locations and policies, HIDZ policy plays a more instrumental role in promoting the quality of urban innovation, while the establishment of HIDZs in other cities is more conducive to increasing the output of urban innovation. Ultimately, we argue that authorities must recognize the importance of integrated development of HIDZs and their host cities and incorporating HIDZs’ impact on the host cities into the HIDZ evaluation. It is necessary to understand that HIDZs have multiple development modes due to their specific local conditions. Hence, differentiated guidance must be carried out rather than directly replicating the experience from developed regions.
Keywords: high-tech industrial development zone (HIDZ); output and quality of urban innovation; performance evaluation; policy implication; difference-in-difference model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/830/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/830/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:830-:d:1116276
Access Statistics for this article
Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma
More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().