EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Why Consider Geomorphology in River Rehabilitation?

Hervé Piégay (), Fanny Arnaud, Barbara Belletti, Mathieu Cassel, Baptiste Marteau, Jérémie Riquier, Christophe Rousson and Daniel Vazquez-Tarrio
Additional contact information
Hervé Piégay: EVS (Environnement-Ville-Société), ENS Lyon, CNRS UMR 5600, F-69362 Lyon, France
Fanny Arnaud: EVS (Environnement-Ville-Société), ENS Lyon, CNRS UMR 5600, F-69362 Lyon, France
Barbara Belletti: EVS (Environnement-Ville-Société), ENS Lyon, CNRS UMR 5600, F-69362 Lyon, France
Mathieu Cassel: EVS (Environnement-Ville-Société), ENS Lyon, CNRS UMR 5600, F-69362 Lyon, France
Baptiste Marteau: EVS (Environnement-Ville-Société), ENS Lyon, CNRS UMR 5600, F-69362 Lyon, France
Jérémie Riquier: EVS (Environnement-Ville-Société), University Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne, CNRS UMR 5600, F-42023 Saint-Étienne, France
Christophe Rousson: EVS (Environnement-Ville-Société), ENS Lyon, CNRS UMR 5600, F-69362 Lyon, France
Daniel Vazquez-Tarrio: Department of Geodynamics, Stratigraphy and Paleontology, Geology Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Land, 2023, vol. 12, issue 8, 1-23

Abstract: River rehabilitation and ecological engineering are becoming critical issues for improving river status when ecological habitats and connectivity have been altered by human pressures. Amongst the range of existing rehabilitation options, some specifically focus on rebuilding fluvial forms and improving physical processes. The aim of this contribution is to illustrate how geomorphological expertise and process-based thinking contribute to river rehabilitation success. This semantic contribution is intended to feed the rehabilitation debate, particularly concerning the design of actions and the proposed references for monitoring target reaches and evaluating rehabilitation effects empirically. This article is also based on lessons learned from practical cases, mainly in gravel-bed rivers. Geomorphic understanding is needed at a local level to achieve an adequate diagnosis of river functioning, estimate human impacts and potential remnant river responsiveness, and to assess the gains and risks from rehabilitation, as well as to appraise success or failure through several pre- and post-project assessment strategies. Geomorphological studies can also be upscaled in a top-down manner (from high-order controls to small-scale processes, understanding detailed processes in their regional or basin-wide context), providing large-scale information at the regional, national, or even global level, information that can be used to diagnose the health of riverscapes in relation to local site-specific contexts. As such, geomorphological studies support strategic planning and prioritization of rehabilitation works according to specific contexts and river responsiveness, so as to move from opportunistic to objective-driven strategies.

Keywords: river restoration; river improvement; diagnosis; evaluation; monitoring; upscaled approach; process-based understanding (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1491/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1491/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1491-:d:1204125

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1491-:d:1204125