Comparison of Sampling and Grid Methods for Regional Soil Erosion Assessment

Zhijia Gu (), Shaomin Cao, Ao Li, Qiang Yi, Shuang Li and Panying Li
Additional contact information
Zhijia Gu: School of Geographical Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
Shaomin Cao: School of Geographical Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
Ao Li: Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Qiang Yi: Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Station of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450008, China
Shuang Li: Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Panying Li: Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Station of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450008, China

Land, 2023, vol. 12, issue 9, 1-17

Abstract: To control soil erosion, the intensity, area, and distribution of regional soil erosion must be determined to accurately plan and implement corresponding soil conservation measures. Therefore, regional soil erosion assessment has received extensive attention worldwide. At present, a sampling survey approach and full-coverage grid-based calculation are mainly applied in regional soil erosion assessment. The quantitative evaluation of the entire region depends on the quality of the data source. Furthermore, owing to the greatness of the evaluation object, the difficulty of data acquisition, the high cost, and poor usability, the present approach is bound to be at the expense of data accuracy, spatial resolution, time resolution, etc. The sampling survey approach can obtain high-precision data of soil erosion factors. Therefore, it can accurately quantify soil erosion in a field investigation unit. However, the sampling method, sampling density, and extrapolation methods have a significant impact on regional soil erosion assessments. This study considers the case of Baiquan County in the rolling hills of Northeast China as an example. Regional soil erosion evaluation using sampling survey and grid computing were compared. The impact of the data source accuracy on the soil erosion assessment was also quantitatively evaluated. The results of grid method showed a phenomenon of large rates of soil erosion and the ratio of the soil erosion area (the share of areas above the mild level), which were overestimated by 20% and 6%, respectively. A digital elevation model (DEM) with a resolution of 30 m can be used for soil erosion evaluation in plain areas, but that with the same resolution in hilly areas has insufficient calculation accuracy and provides large errors. The grid method can be adopted when land use and soil conservation measures are accurate. Otherwise, the sampling method is recommended. Interpolation of the ratio of the soil erosion area in the survey unit based on land use can better evaluate regional soil erosion.

Keywords: regional soil erosion; sampling survey; CSLE; Northeast China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1703/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1703/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1703-:d:1229552

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().