Determinants of Public Participation in Watershed Management in Southeast China: An Application of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework

Daile Zeng, Boya Chen, Jingxin Wang, John L. Innes, Juliet Lu, Futao Guo, Yancun Yan and Guangyu Wang ()
Additional contact information
Daile Zeng: Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
Boya Chen: Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
Jingxin Wang: School of Management, Yale University, 165 Whitney Ave, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
John L. Innes: Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
Juliet Lu: Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
Futao Guo: College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
Yancun Yan: Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
Guangyu Wang: Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

Land, 2024, vol. 13, issue 11, 1-23

Abstract: Increasingly, adaptive processes and decentralization are vital aspects of watershed governance. Equitable and sustainable water governance requires an understanding that different societal members have unique relationships with the environment and varying levels of interaction with policymakers. However, the factors facilitating public involvement under centralized governance remain less understood. This study combined the Institutional Analysis and Development framework with ordered probit regression to empirically investigate the determinants of willingness to participate (WTP) and actual participation of the public in integrated watershed management (IWM). Data from 933 valid questionnaires collected across 36 counties in Fujian, China, were used to define stakeholders’ perceptions of IWM. Results show that stakeholders are predominantly willing to participate in watershed conservation, management, or planning (85.9%), while only 32.8% frequently attend related events. Pro-environmental intentions were mainly shaped by interactional capacity—information exposure, interpersonal exchanges, and cross-reach support recognition—while actual participation was influenced by perceived biophysical conditions, rules-in-use, socioeconomic factors, and interactional capacity. Frequent observations of poor forest management practices were correlated with higher behavioral intentions, and socioeconomic dynamics significantly affected self-reported actual participation. Information sharing had the most substantial positive impact on both WTP and actual participation. These findings reinforce the necessity for an integrated and holistic approach to regional watershed resource management that fosters inclusivity and sustainability. This study provides workable insights into the social and institutional factors that shape public participation in watershed governance as it evolves toward decentralization.

Keywords: public participation; questionnaire analysis; integrated watershed management; interactional capacity; institutional analysis and development framework (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1824/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1824/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1824-:d:1513005

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().