Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Preservation: The Case of a Proposed Hydropower Project in Southern Iceland

Clint Cook (), Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir and David Cook
Additional contact information
Clint Cook: Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir: Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
David Cook: Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland

Land, 2024, vol. 13, issue 2, 1-29

Abstract: When decision makers use a financial approach to review the costs and benefits of new renewable energy projects, the economic value of changes in social welfare resulting from impacts on natural resources is not included in the analysis. Iceland’s policy objective for carbon neutrality by 2040 will require constructing new power plants. This study aimed to estimate the economic preservation value for the Hólmsá and Tungufljót river basins in southern Iceland using the contingent valuation method. A web-based survey of Icelandic residents was conducted between 13 November 2022 and 19 December 2022 using a stratified random sample of 2909 adults. The response rate was 46.6%, with 35.1% of respondents indicating a willingness to pay (WTP) to protect the area from hydropower development. After excluding protest voters and accounting for those with and without WTP, the estimated mean WTP equaled ISK 5515. When scaled to the adult population of Icelandic residents, that equates to a total environmental and social cost of between ISK 1.52 and 1.70 billion. Compared to the estimated levelized cost of energy for the Hólmsárvirkjun at Atley hydropower project, this aggregation equates to an estimated 5.6% markup in total project costs, excluding transmission lines. Accounting for these economic costs in decision making allows for a more holistic understanding of new energy project costs and net present benefits.

Keywords: preservation value; willingness to pay; preferences; non-market valuation; cost–benefit analysis; Hólmsárvirkjun at Atley (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/159/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/159/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:159-:d:1329566

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().