Spatial Pattern and Coordination Relationship of Production–Living–Ecological Space Function and Residents’ Behavior Flow in Rural–Urban Fringe Areas

Xiaochen Sun, Bingzi Zhang, Shuni Ye, Sara Grigoryan, Yazhuo Zhang () and Yike Hu ()
Additional contact information
Xiaochen Sun: School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Bingzi Zhang: School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Shuni Ye: School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Sara Grigoryan: School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Yazhuo Zhang: School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Yike Hu: School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Land, 2024, vol. 13, issue 4, 1-22

Abstract: Territorial spatial planning requires thoughtful consideration of the scientific layout and synergistic control of production, living, and ecological spaces (PLESs). However, research in this field often neglects the human perspective and fails to account for people’s demands and behavioral characteristics. This study evaluates the level and spatial characteristics of residents’ production, living, and ecological behavioral (PLEB) flow, as well as the spatial pattern of the PLES functions, within the framework of the human–land coupling system. Therefore, to analyze the behavior–space coupling coordination relationship, the coupling coordination model is applied. The results indicate that the overall level of residents’ PLEB flow in rural–urban fringe areas is at a lower middle level and the functionality of the PLES is at a medium level, with a spatial distribution pattern of high in the northern and low in the southern areas. Most of the behavior–space matching types are in a state of mismatch between supply and demand. Meanwhile, the PLEB–PLES coupling coordination relationship is generally unbalanced, which is particularly noticeable in the production space. Regardless of whether the behavior–space matching type is a supply deficit or a supply surplus, the mismatch between supply and demand leads to uncoordinated and unreasonable spatial utilization. Overall, the findings of the study provide guidance for future research endeavors about PLESs and suggest embracing a human-centered scientific paradigm. Such a paradigm can promote high-quality, sustainable development of territorial spatial planning while strengthening the capacity and effectiveness of spatial governance and control.

Keywords: production–living–ecological space; production–living–ecological behavior; land use function; behavioral flow; coordination coupling relationship (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/446/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/446/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:446-:d:1368128

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().