EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Spatial Heterogeneity Analysis of the Multidimensional Characteristics of Urban Green Spaces in China—A Study Based on 285 Prefecture-Level Cities

Wei Zhao, Dianfeng Liu (), Jiqiang Niu, Jianhua He and Feng Xu
Additional contact information
Wei Zhao: School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
Dianfeng Liu: School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
Jiqiang Niu: School of Geographical Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
Jianhua He: School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
Feng Xu: School of Geographical Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China

Land, 2024, vol. 13, issue 7, 1-22

Abstract: Quantitative measurement of urban green spaces (UGSs) plays a fundamental role in enhancing their ecological functions and services. Current studies have not adequately analyzed the multifunctional characteristics and the diverse benefits of urban green spaces at the national scale. This study developed a multidimensional indicator system in terms of scale, pattern, and services to measure green spaces in 285 prefecture-level cities in China. The influences of different geographic zones and urban development on UGS characteristics were also investigated. The results showed that per capita area of urban green spaces were significantly different between the two sides of the “Botai Line”, and the UGS structure was mainly dominated by woodlands. Urban green spaces in the central and east had higher fragmentation, lower landscape diversity, and weaker connectivity. The spatial accessibility of green spaces exhibited a “low–high–medium” pattern from north to south in China, with central-eastern China experiencing the worst equity in green space supply. Overall, cities with higher integrated benefits of green spaces were mainly located in Northeast and North China. Type I large cities had higher ratings for UGS characteristics compared with the other types of cities. These findings can serve as solid guidance for cities seeking to build green space systems with highly integrated socio–ecological benefits.

Keywords: urban green space; quantity and scale; spatial patterns; social services; multidimensional characteristics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1050/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1050/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1050-:d:1434720

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1050-:d:1434720