EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

An Ecoregional Conservation Assessment for the Southern Rocky Mountains Ecoregion and Santa Fe Subregion, Wyoming to New Mexico, USA

Dominick A. DellaSala (), Kaia Africanis, Bryant C. Baker and Marni Koopman
Additional contact information
Dominick A. DellaSala: Wild Heritage, a Project of Earth Island Institute, 2150 Allston Way, Ste 460, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
Kaia Africanis: Wild Heritage, a Project of Earth Island Institute, 2150 Allston Way, Ste 460, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
Bryant C. Baker: Wildland Mapping Institute, Ventura, CA 93006, USA
Marni Koopman: Independent Researcher, 1206 Linda Avenue, Ashland, OR 97520, USA

Land, 2024, vol. 13, issue 9, 1-26

Abstract: We conducted a multi-scaled Ecoregional Conservation Assessment for the Southern Rockies (~14.5 M ha) and its trailing edge, the Santa Fe Subregion (~2.2 M ha), from Wyoming to New Mexico, USA. We included a representation analysis of Existing Vegetation Types (EVTs), mature and old-growth forests (MOG), and four focal species—Canada lynx ( Lynx canadensis ), North American wolverine ( Gulo gulo luscus ), Mexican spotted owl ( Strix occidentalis lucida ), and northern goshawk ( Accipiter gentilis )—in relation to 30 × 30 and 50 × 50 conservation targets. To integrate conservation targets with wildfire risk reduction to the built environment and climate change planning, we overlaid the location of wildfires and forest treatments in relation to the Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) and included downscaled climate projections for a lower (RCP4.5) and higher (RCP8.5) emission scenario. Protected areas were highly skewed toward upper-elevation EVTs (most were >50% protected), underrepresented forest types (<30% protected), especially MOG (<22% protected) and riparian areas (~14% protected), and poorly represented habitats (<30%) for at least three of the focal species, especially in the subregion where nearly all the targets underperformed compared to the ecoregion. Most (>73%) forest-thinning treatments over the past decade were >1 km from delineated WUI areas, well beyond the distance at which vegetation management can effectively reduce structure ignition risk (<50 m from structures). Extreme heat, drought, snowpack reductions, altered timing of peak stream flows, increasing wildfires, and potential shifts in the climate, favoring woodlands over conifer forests, may impact forest-dependent species, while declining snowpack may impact wolverines that den at upper elevations. Strategically targeting the built environment for fuel treatments would improve wildfire risk reduction and may allow for expansion of protected areas held up in controversy. Stepped-up protection for roadless areas, adoption of wilderness proposals, and greater protection for MOG and riparian forests are critical for meeting representation targets.

Keywords: biodiversity; climate change; ecoregion; conservation; Santa Fe; Southern Rockies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1432/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1432/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1432-:d:1471364

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1432-:d:1471364