Assessing Rural Landscape Change Within the Planning and Management Framework: The Case of Topaktaş Village (Van, Turkiye)

Feran Aşur (), Kübra Karaman, Okan Yeler and Simay Kaskan
Additional contact information
Feran Aşur: Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van 65090, Türkiye
Kübra Karaman: Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat 66100, Türkiye
Okan Yeler: Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van 65090, Türkiye
Simay Kaskan: Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van 65090, Türkiye

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 10, 1-26

Abstract: Rural landscapes are changing rapidly, yet many assessments remain descriptive and weakly connected to planning instruments. This study connects rural landscape analysis with planning and management by examining post-earthquake transformations in Topaktaş (Tuşba, Van), a village redesigned and relocated after the 2011 events. Using ArcGIS 10.8 and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), we integrate DEM, slope, aspect, CORINE land cover Plus, surface-water presence/seasonality, and proximity to hazards (active and surface-rupture faults) and infrastructure (Karasu Stream, highways, village roads). A risk overlay is treated as a hard constraint. We produce suitability maps for settlement, agriculture, recreation, and industry; derive a composite optimum land-use surface; and translate outputs into decision rules (e.g., a 0–100 m fault no-build setback, riparian buffers, and slope thresholds) with an outline for implementation and monitoring. Key findings show legacy footprints at lower elevations, while new footprints cluster near the upper elevation band (DEM range 1642–1735 m). Most of the area exhibits 0–3% slopes, supporting low-impact access where hazards are manageable; however, several newly designated settlement tracts conflict with risk and water-service conditions. Although limited to a single case and available data resolutions, the workflow is transferable: it moves beyond mapping to actionable planning instruments—zoning overlays, buffers, thresholds, and phased management—supporting sustainable, culturally informed post-earthquake reconstruction.

Keywords: post-earthquake reconstruction; rural landscape; Analytic Hierarchy Process; landscape planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/1991/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/1991/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:1991-:d:1764504

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().