Regionalization of the Croatian Landscape: An Integrative Approach to Methods and Criteria for Defining Boundaries

Lara Bogovac (), Monika Kamenečki, Petra Pereković, Ines Hrdalo and Dora Tomić Reljić ()
Additional contact information
Lara Bogovac: Department of Ornamental Plants, Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Monika Kamenečki: Department of Ornamental Plants, Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Petra Pereković: Department of Ornamental Plants, Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Ines Hrdalo: Department of Ornamental Plants, Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Dora Tomić Reljić: Department of Ornamental Plants, Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 10, 1-24

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to examine how existing regionalizations in the Republic of Croatia differ in their criteria for region separation, to identify their similarities and differences, and to outline the key characteristics of each defined region. As landscape research is broad and interdisciplinary, regionalization plays an important role in developing landscape typology. This is particularly relevant in Croatia, where landscape studies are still at an early stage, making it necessary to establish clear starting points for a unified approach in future research. The method included overlapping two landscape, four geographic, one natural, and three cultural regionalizations in two subject areas in Lika and in Bilogora and the Kalnik foothills. The results showed that there are greater similarities between regionalizations based on natural features (relief and hydrological features), while there are greater differences between cultural regionalizations, as these also include human perception of the landscape. Furthermore, there are greater similarities between regions in the Lika area, while in Bilogora and the Kalnik foothills a quite different understanding of regional boundaries through various aspects is evident. It was determined that the scope of areas carrying the identity of both regions (obtained by an intersectional methodological approach) differs from the scope of regions as perceived by the local population. In conclusion, the contemporary identity of the landscape is subject to constant review due to new scientific knowledge and changes in perception, where it is crucial to consider all available data and include the public in defining regional boundaries.

Keywords: landscape regionalization; landscape identity; landscape character; overlapping; Bilogora; Kalnik; Lika (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2068/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2068/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2068-:d:1772909

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().