Farmland’s Comprehensive Improvement and Agricultural Total Factor Productivity Increase: Empirical Evidence from China’s National Construction of High-Standard Farmland

Jiquan Peng, Anhong Huang, Juan Chen () and Lili Chen
Additional contact information
Jiquan Peng: School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
Anhong Huang: School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
Juan Chen: School of Business Administration, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China
Lili Chen: School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 11, 1-30

Abstract: Farmland improvement has become an overwhelmingly favorable policy in developing countries, being expected to leverage a sustainable agricultural total factor productivity (ATFP) to increase their agricultural competitiveness. Worldwide farmland improvement projects are experiencing an evolution from single goals to comprehensive goals (e.g., comprehensively improve the farmland quality by decreasing farmland abandonment and fragmentation and meanwhile improving soil–water conditions and machinery affordability). However, performances of comprehensive farmland improvement projects have been questioned, especially considering its implementary complexity and regional heterogeneity. This study applies a continuous difference-in-difference (DID) method to China’s provincial panel data (2005–2020) to analyze the impact of the high-standard farmland construction policy (which started China’s national project on comprehensive farmland improvement) on ATFP. Results show the policy significantly increases ATFP by 0.101 units. Moreover, parallel trend and robustness test results indicate the policy effect has stability and continuity. Heterogeneity analysis results show the policy effect is greater in major grain-producing regions than non-major grain-producing regions, the central regions than western or eastern regions, and regions with high disease—pest control and soil—water conservation levels than areas with low levels. Mechanism analysis results show the policy effect is achieved through three paths—operation scale increase (mediating effect size is 16.13%), planting structure adjustment (mediating effect size 12.80%), and agricultural disaster reduction (mediating effect size 13.74%). Thus, this study advocates sustainable and specialized high-standard farmland construction: it suggests post-construction policies maintaining high-standard farmland quality and detailed policies considering different regions’ heterogeneity.

Keywords: farmland improvement; land policy; high-standard farmland; agricultural total factor productivity (ATFP); continuous difference-in-difference (DID) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/11/2218/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/11/2218/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:2218-:d:1790724

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().