Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas in Mitigating Human Disturbance: A Case Study of the Qilian Mountains for 2000–2022

Yun Li, Jian Gong () and Shicheng Li ()
Additional contact information
Yun Li: School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Jian Gong: School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Shicheng Li: School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 11, 1-17

Abstract: Evaluating the management effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) is critical for refining conservation strategies. One of the key components in the management of PA is the regulation of human disturbance. We evaluated the management effectiveness of the Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve (QMNNR) in mitigating human disturbance for 2000–2022. Human footprint was used as a key indicator of human disturbance. It integrates eight human disturbance factors: built environments, population density, night-time lights, cropland, pastureland, roads, railways, and navigable waterways. Evaluations are conducted across dual spatial dimensions: (1) constructing an equal-area external buffer zone to compare human footprint dynamics inside versus outside the reserve; and (2) testing the hypothesis that “stricter zonation correlates with improved control of human disturbance” by analyzing management gradients across four functional zones (core, buffer, experimental, and peripheral protection zones). Key findings include the following: (1) The increase in human footprint within the reserve was markedly lower than in surrounding areas, with the internal–external human footprint disparity expanding from 2000 to 2022. (2) Spatial analysis reveals concentrated disturbance hotspots in northern buffer zones, whereas only marginal increases occurred in Sunan County within the reserve. (3) Human footprint growth across functional zones followed a clear ascending order: core zone < buffer zone < experimental zone < peripheral protection zone, validating the efficacy of zoned management. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the QMNNR has effectively curbed human disturbance expansion—particularly in its core area—though vigilance is warranted against emerging “ecological island” risks in the northern peripheral zone. The proposed dual-dimensional human footprint assessment framework further offers a standardized evaluation methodology for large-scale PA in mitigating human disturbance.

Keywords: human pressure; nature reserve; management effectiveness; functional zoning management; comparative analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/11/2229/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/11/2229/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:2229-:d:1792169

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().