Titling as Land Reform in Tanzania: Contours, Conflicts and Convergence

Kathryn E. Owens, Kelly M. Askew (), Shyamala Nagaraj, Faustin Maganga, Howard Stein and Rie Odgaard
Additional contact information
Kathryn E. Owens: Independent Consultant, Alameda, CA 94501, USA
Kelly M. Askew: Center for Political Studies, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Shyamala Nagaraj: Center for Political Studies, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Faustin Maganga: Directorate of Research, Innovation and Consultancy, St. John’s University of Tanzania, P.O. Box 47 Dodoma, Tanzania
Howard Stein: Department of Afroamerican and African Studies, College of Literature, Science and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Rie Odgaard: Danish Institute for International Studies, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 11, 1-32

Abstract: The “land governance orthodoxy” that has dominated development circles for the past two decades posits that government-issued title deeds are a prerequisite for economic growth in Africa and elsewhere in the Global South. Anything other than formal certification is viewed as inadequate, informal, insecure and inanimate. In this paper, we explore the “institutional pluralism” that characterizes land formalization efforts in rural Tanzania. We find that the multiple (often competing) objectives, procedures, actors, justifications, technologies, and outcomes have produced a crowded and chaotic field of titling initiatives. Despite an investment of around USD 340 million, progress remains painfully slow—at a rate of ~1% per year—such that it will take the rest of this century to reach universal titling. And at what cost? Our study is based on appraisals of policy and project documents and interviews with government officials, donor agencies, project implementers and NGO staff. Discussion of the findings is supported by data from annual budget speeches, national-level statistics and survey data collected by our team from forty Tanzanian villages. We argue that it is time to return to a broader, integrated approach to rural development and recognize that local landholding systems offer high levels of security. Our findings have relevance beyond land formalization to other areas where duplicative efforts implemented in the name of progress might be counterproductive to achieving economic and social development goals.

Keywords: land reform; titling; Tanzania; institutional pluralism; formalization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/11/2247/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/11/2247/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:2247-:d:1793809

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().