Enhancing the Valuation of Cultural Ecosystem Services Provided by Coastal Beaches Through Economic and Biophysical Methods
Chi-Ok Oh (),
Namhee Kim and
Yoonja Kang
Additional contact information
Chi-Ok Oh: Graduate School of Culture, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
Namhee Kim: Cultural Convergence Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
Yoonja Kang: Department of Ocean Integrated Science, Chonnam National University, Yeosu 59626, Republic of Korea
Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 2, 1-19
Abstract:
This study evaluates cultural ecosystem services (CESs) provided by coastal beaches in Korea using two valuation methods: choice experiments (CEs) and the energy method (EM). CESs, which include non-material benefits like recreation and esthetic enjoyment, are difficult to quantify through traditional market-based approaches. The CE method estimates individuals’ willingness to pay (WTP), offering an economic valuation, while the EM calculates the energy inputs required to sustain CESs, providing a biophysical perspective. The study compares CES values from both methods across 266 beaches in Korea. CES values from the CE method ranged from 6 million Korean won (KRW) (USD 5400) to KRW 93 billion (USD 84 million), while the EM yielded values between KRW 40 million (USD 36,000) and KRW 112 billion (USD 101 million). The EM generally yields higher valuations, particularly for rural beaches with fewer visitors, where ecological contributions dominate. In contrast, the CE values are closely aligned with the EM results for urban beaches, where human preferences and ecological inputs converge. These findings highlight the value of integrating economic and biophysical perspectives to provide policymakers with comprehensive data for balancing economic development and ecological conservation in coastal management. By adopting a dual-method approach, this research provides policymakers with concrete insights into optimizing resource allocation, prioritizing conservation efforts for less-visited rural beaches, and supporting sustainable coastal development tailored to regional characteristics.
Keywords: cultural ecosystem services; non-market valuation; stated preference methods; choice experiments; energy method; coastal beaches (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/280/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/280/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:280-:d:1579888
Access Statistics for this article
Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma
More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().