Changes in Nature Conservation-Relevant Public Participation Processes Through Digitalization: The Case of Germany

Stefan Heiland (), Markus Günther, Brigitte Holzhauer, Florian Kern and Josephin Wagner
Additional contact information
Stefan Heiland: Chair of Landscape Planning and Development, Technische Universität Berlin, Sekr. EB 5, Straße des 17. Juni 145, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Markus Günther: Chair of Landscape Planning and Development, Technische Universität Berlin, Sekr. EB 5, Straße des 17. Juni 145, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Brigitte Holzhauer: Holzhauerei-Forschung und Beratung, Uhlandstraße 20, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
Florian Kern: Institute for Ecological Economy Research (IÖW), Potsdamer Str. 105, 10785 Berlin, Germany
Josephin Wagner: Institute for Ecological Economy Research (IÖW), Potsdamer Str. 105, 10785 Berlin, Germany

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 2, 1-16

Abstract: The literature shows that limited research has been conducted on the changes induced by digital means in public participation processes on plans whose implementation could have an impact on nature conservation and landscape development. To contribute to closing this research gap, 15 expert interviews were conducted to shed light on the use of digital tools in public participation processes in Germany. The analysis examined potential changes in the quantity and diversity of participants, timing and duration of involvement, tone and content, and the influence of participation on decision-making. The experts’ experiences vary widely, and knowledge must still be consolidated. The findings suggest that using digital instruments can increase the number of participants and the variety of social groups they represent. Other factors, such as personal interest and implications or potential for conflict, are more crucial to participating. However, digital tools allow for easier participation at various stages of participation if all necessary information is provided online. The tone of the discussion appears to be significantly influenced by the specific digital tool used for participation; for example, a plenary video session may unfold in an orderly manner, but the concurrent chat discussion can become chaotic or even insulting without strict facilitation. Digital tools might increase public interest in planning processes and lead to a higher relevance of citizens’ opinions in decision-making. However, this does not necessarily impact its outcome, as various opinions can neutralize each other. Observing this development more intensively seems necessary to take advantage of opportunities and counteract digitalization risks. Nonetheless, it can be concluded that digital formats cannot and should not replace analog forms of participation; rather, both should be combined in hybrid forms.

Keywords: digitalization; public participation; nature conservation; landscape; planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/305/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/305/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:305-:d:1582323

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().