EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Optimizing Water Footprint, Productivity, and Sustainability in Southern Italian Olive Groves: The Role of Organic Fertilizers and Irrigation Management

Pasquale Garofalo (), Liliana Gaeta, Carolina Vitti, Luisa Giglio and Rita Leogrande ()
Additional contact information
Pasquale Garofalo: Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Via C. Ulpiani 5, 70125 Bari, Italy
Liliana Gaeta: Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Via C. Ulpiani 5, 70125 Bari, Italy
Carolina Vitti: Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Via C. Ulpiani 5, 70125 Bari, Italy
Luisa Giglio: Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Via C. Ulpiani 5, 70125 Bari, Italy
Rita Leogrande: Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Via C. Ulpiani 5, 70125 Bari, Italy

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 2, 1-28

Abstract: This modeling study evaluates the combined effects of organic fertilization and irrigation regimes on olive productivity and environmental sustainability in southern Italy. Field experiments were conducted in an organic olive grove (cv. Leccino) under Mediterranean conditions, testing four organic fertilization treatments—biochar (BCH), compost (CMP), dried blood (DB), and a commercial organic fertilizer (CTR)—and two irrigation strategies. The CropWat model was employed to simulate additional irrigation scenarios, ranging from full irrigation (Full; 100% ETc) to rainfed conditions. Results showed that biochar-treated olive groves achieved the highest yields (up to 3756 kg ha −1 under full irrigation), outperforming other treatments, with yields of 3191 kg ha −1 (CMP), 2590 kg ha −1 (DB), and 2110 kg ha −1 (CTR). Deficit irrigation strategies, such as ceasing irrigation during the pit-hardening stage (Red_Farm; 1160 m 3 ha −1 ), reduced water use by 67% compared to Full (3600 m 3 ha −1 ) while maintaining satisfactory yields (3070 kg ha −1 vs. 2035 kg ha −1 on average across all fertilization treatments). Water footprint (WFP) analysis revealed that BCH consistently achieved the lowest WFP values (e.g., 1220 m 3 t −1 under Full and 687 m 3 t −1 under rainfed conditions), outperforming CTR (1605 m 3 t −1 ), CMP (1645 m 3 t −1 ), and DB (1846 m 3 t −1 ) under full irrigation and 810 m 3 t −1 , 1219 m 3 t −1 , and 1147 m 3 t −1 with no irrigation water supply. Incremental water productivity (IRincr) and marginal water footprint efficiency (WFP incr ) further demonstrated that BCH optimized both productivity and environmental sustainability, with IRincr values of 0.55 kg m −3 and WFP incr values of 1.58 m 3 kg −1 (averaged for all water regimes), better than CTR (0.40 kg m −3 and 2.14 m 3 kg −1 ), CMP (0.46 kg m −3 and 1.93 m 3 kg −1 ), and DB (0.38 kg m −3 and 2.32 m 3 kg −1 ). An aggregated scoring system, based on standardized and normalized data, ranked BCH under the Red_Farm irrigation strategy as the most effective management approach, achieving the highest overall score compared to the other fertilizer treatments in combination with the different irrigation strategies, thereby balancing high yields with significant water savings.

Keywords: water use; CropWat; aggregated metric; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/318/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/318/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:318-:d:1584023

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-05
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:318-:d:1584023