EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Seasonal Dynamics of Soil Respiration in an Alpine Meadow: In Situ Monitoring of Freeze–Thaw Cycle Responses on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

Pei Wang and Chunqiu Li ()
Additional contact information
Pei Wang: The State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Hazards Risk Governance, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Chunqiu Li: School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 2, 1-17

Abstract: Understanding the dynamics of soil respiration (Rs) in response to freeze–thaw cycles is crucial due to permafrost degradation on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP). We conducted continuous in situ observations of Rs using an Li-8150 automated soil CO 2 flux system, categorizing the freeze–thaw cycle into four stages: completely thawed (CT), autumn freeze–thaw (AFT), completely frozen (CF), and spring freeze–thaw (SFT). Our results revealed distinct differences in Rs magnitudes, diurnal patterns, and controlling factors across these stages, attributed to varying thermal regimes. The mean Rs values were as follows: 2.51 (1.10) μmol·m −2 ·s −1 (CT), 0.37 (0.04) μmol·m −2 ·s −1 (AFT), 0.19 (0.06) μmol·m −2 ·s −1 (CF), and 0.68 (0.19) μmol·m −2 ·s −1 (SFT). Cumulatively, the Rs contributions to annual totals were 89.32% (CT), 0.79% (AFT), 5.01% (CF), and 4.88% (SFT). Notably, the temperature sensitivity (Q10) value during SFT was 2.79 times greater than that in CT (4.63), underscoring the significance of CO 2 emissions during spring warming. Soil temperature was the primary driver of Rs in the CT stage, while soil moisture at 5 cm depth and solar radiation significantly influenced Rs during SFT. Our findings suggest that global warming will alter seasonal Rs patterns as freeze–thaw phases evolve, emphasizing the need to monitor CO 2 emissions from alpine meadow ecosystems during spring.

Keywords: soil CO 2 emissions; thermal regimes; climate change; freeze–thaw phenomena; temperature sensitivity; ecosystem monitoring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/391/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/391/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:391-:d:1590406

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:391-:d:1590406