Practical Steps for Urban Flood Risk Mitigation Using Nature-Based Solutions—A Case Study in New Cairo, Egypt

Walaa S. E. Ismaeel () and Nada Ali Mustafa
Additional contact information
Walaa S. E. Ismaeel: Faculty of Engineering, Architectural Engineering Department, The British University in Egypt, El-Sherouk City 11837, Egypt
Nada Ali Mustafa: Faculty of Engineering, Architectural Engineering Department, The British University in Egypt, El-Sherouk City 11837, Egypt

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 3, 1-19

Abstract: This study investigated the effectiveness of nature-based solutions (NBSs) as a resilient strategy for mitigating urban flood risks in a developing hot arid country. The research method included the following steps: (a) performing a flood hazard risk assessment for the Fifth Settlement district in New Cairo , Egypt, (b) selecting best-fit NBSs, and (c) performance assessment. The process started with flood hazard analysis using hydrological data, topographical maps, urban planning, and land use maps, in addition to the history of storm events. This step defined the urban areas located in flood depth zones and categorized their flood hazard level. Exposure assessment considered the number and characteristics of population and buildings exposed to flood hazards. Vulnerability assessment determined the vulnerable characteristics of exposed populations and buildings to flood risk. The result of this assessment step indicated that there were 2000 buildings distributed in almost twenty neighborhood areas facing high flood risk. One of these urban areas with 72 building units, including residential, public, and services buildings, was selected to test the potential of integrating NBSs for flood-resilient land use planning and disaster preparedness. The selection of best-fit NBSs was based on a weighted-average sum matrix considering their climatic and contextual suitability and applicability. As a final step, numerical simulation models helped assess the efficiency of the selected NBSs for stormwater runoff reduction and the percentage of the volume capture goal. Five simulation models tested the efficiency of each NBS individually. Rain gardens achieved the highest stormwater capture percentage, while green roofs performed the least effectively, with capture rates of 43.6% and 9.9%, respectively. Two more simulation models were developed to evaluate the efficiency of NBSs when implemented in combination compared to the base case of using no NBSs. Permeable paving demonstrated the highest effectiveness in volume capture. The result indicated that applying combined measures of NBSs over 54.1% of the total site area was able to capture 8% more than the required volume capture goal. Consequently, this study underscores the necessity of adopting tailored solutions and integrated approaches using NBSs for flood risk mitigation. This necessitates testing their performance under site-specific conditions and future climate projections.

Keywords: disaster risk reduction; flood risk management; mitigation measures; nature-based solutions; flood risk assessment; vulnerability assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/586/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/586/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:586-:d:1609321

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().