Effects of Management Practices on Soil Microbial Diversity and Structure on Eucalyptus Plantations

Yuanyuan Xue, Wei Liu (), Qi Feng, Jutao Zhang, Lingge Wang, Zexia Chen, Xuejiao Li and Meng Zhu ()
Additional contact information
Yuanyuan Xue: Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Wei Liu: Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Qi Feng: Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Jutao Zhang: Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Lingge Wang: Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Zexia Chen: Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Xuejiao Li: Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Meng Zhu: Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 4, 1-19

Abstract: Soil microbes are critical in regulating the growth and function of eucalyptus plantations. The mechanisms underlying soil microbial communities’ response to different eucalyptus plantation management practices remain elusive. In this study, we compiled datasets containing 2744 observations across global eucalyptus-planted regions and analyzed the effects of five management practices (i.e., burning, residual removal, fertilization, mixed planting, and controlling planting years) on soil microbial biomass, diversity, and structures. Our results showed that fungal community alpha diversity responds more sensitively to management practices than bacterial community alpha diversity on eucalyptus plantations. Although the implementation of management practices significantly increased the content of most soil nutrients and microbial biomass elements (excluding burning), these practices did not necessarily improve soil microbial biomass and diversity, particularly among fungal communities. Burning, fertilization, and mixing eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing species significantly decreased the diversity of fungal communities, which were mainly impacted by soil organic carbon and total potassium content. Compared to the four other management practices, mixing eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing species favored the growth of bacterial communities and the storage of microbial biomass nitrogen, making it the most effective management practice. However, attention should also be paid to the protection of fungal communities. In addition, these management practices significantly changed microbial community structures, which were positively correlated with the microbial biomass elements carbon and nitrogen and, to a lesser extent, soil microbial alpha diversity. Our results highlight the importance of prioritizing mixing eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing species as a management practice and safeguarding fungal community diversity during its implementation and suggest that microbial diversity development associated with soil organic carbon and potassium contents should be given priority in eucalyptus plantation management.

Keywords: soil microbial community; eucalyptus; management practices; meta-analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/692/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/692/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:692-:d:1619874

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().