Interactions of Ecosystem Services and Management Optimization in Complex Hilly Mountainous Environments: A Case Study from Southern China

Yezi Wang, Xijun Hu (), Zhao Wang, Yali Zhang, Cunyou Chen and Baojing Wei
Additional contact information
Yezi Wang: College of Landscape Architecture, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
Xijun Hu: College of Landscape Architecture, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
Zhao Wang: School of Life and Environmental Science, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
Yali Zhang: College of Landscape Architecture, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
Cunyou Chen: College of Landscape Architecture, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
Baojing Wei: College of Landscape Architecture, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 4, 1-20

Abstract: Hilly mountainous regions are ecologically complex, featuring diverse environmental ecosystem services (ESs) and intricate interactions. However, the variability, drivers, and management of these ESs remain poorly understood, particularly in regions with significant topographical and climatic heterogeneity. This study focuses on the southern hilly mountain belt of China, examining five key ecosystem services: food production (FP), carbon storage (CS), water yield (WY), habitat quality (HQ), and soil conservation (SC). This study examines these ESs across long-term, pixel, and regional scales, exploring the interactive relationships and identifying the driving factors and cluster characteristics. The results indicate the following: (1) Over the past 23 years, although food production and carbon storage have increased, habitat quality has declined. (2) From a spatial perspective, the differences in trade-offs and synergies across the years are relatively small. However, significant differences are observed when considering continuous temporal change, and trade-off relationships are generally prevalent. Additionally, the distribution of trade-offs and synergies is also influenced by a combination of factors. (3) Climatic, vegetation, topographical, and socioeconomic factors are key factors influencing the distribution and changes in ESs. For instance, climate–vegetation interactions enhance carbon storage and soil conservation. Socioeconomic factors, though less impactful, optimize ESs through land management and policy. (4) We found that the ecological priority region covers the largest area, followed by the hilly agricultural development zone, the mountainous agricultural and forestry development zone, and the integrated ecological security zone. These findings deepen our understanding of ESs in hilly mountainous regions, providing actionable insights for enhancing conservation and sustainable management in complex landscapes.

Keywords: ecosystem service; ecosystem service bundle; trade-off and synergy; southern hilly mountain belt; driving factors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/717/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/717/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:717-:d:1621721

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().