Multiple Paths of Rural Transformation and Its Driving Mechanisms Under the Perspective of Rural–Urban Continuum: Taking Suzhou, China as an Example

Ping Xu, Han Mu, Jingwei Shao and Yuan Yuan ()
Additional contact information
Ping Xu: School of Public Administration, Hohai University, 8 Fochengxi Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211100, China
Han Mu: School of Public Administration, Hohai University, 8 Fochengxi Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211100, China
Jingwei Shao: School of Public Administration, Hohai University, 8 Fochengxi Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211100, China
Yuan Yuan: School of Public Administration, Hohai University, 8 Fochengxi Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211100, China

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 6, 1-23

Abstract: Under the context of urban–rural integration, exploring the complex process and general patterns of rural transformation is a critical issue for advancing sustainable rural development. This study develops a theoretical framework for rural transformation from the perspective of the rural–urban continuum. By analyzing the shifting urban–rural dominance relationships across different periods in township units, we extracted the main paths of rural transformation. Empirical analysis of 46 townships in Suzhou, China from 1990 to 2020 reveals the following key findings: (1) The urban–rural dominance relationships in township units have undergone an evolution from “differentiation to intensification to stabilization” over the past three decades, shaped by two pivotal moments—the Sunan Model and the New Sunan Model. (2) By combining four modes (enhancement, weakening, stabilization, and exchange) across different time periods, three primary paths of rural transformation in Suzhou emerge: a continuous stabilization type, a mid-late enhancement type, and a mid-term weakening type. (3) The spatial heterogeneity of the driving mechanisms is particularly evident in the northern region’s modernization of agriculture, the southern region’s characteristic fisheries, the western region’s localized urbanization, and the eastern region’s integration of industry, city, and population (I-C-P). The diverse paths identified in this study offer a deeper understanding of the simplified macro trend in which rurality weakens and urbanity strengthens, providing valuable insights for the tailored promotion of rural revitalization.

Keywords: rural–urban continuum; urban–rural integration; rural revitalization; rurality; township; Suzhou (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1145/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1145/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1145-:d:1663687

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().