 Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration at a Small Watershed Scale: A Case Study in Dali Prefecture of Yunnan Province in ChinaQiyuan Zhou,
Qiuping Zhu,
Yu Feng and
Jinman Wang ()
Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 6, 1-28 Abstract: Conducting ecological restoration has emerged as a critical governance strategy for enhancing ecosystem diversity, stability, and sustainability. The scientific identification of priority restoration areas is a prerequisite for effective ecological restoration projects. Current research on identifying priority restoration zones predominantly relies on administrative-scale frameworks, and the reliability and scientificity of the identified results are somewhat insufficient. To address this gap, this study selected Dali Prefecture in Yunnan Province, a region characterized by dense river networks, as the research area to identify the priority areas of ecological restoration. In view of the application of the InVest model in watershed-scale restoration, biodiversity assessment, and other fields, we utilize sub-watershed units and the InVEST model, and five key ecosystem services—water conservation, water purification (N/P), habitat quality, climate regulation, and soil retention—were quantified. Temporal changes in these services from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed alongside ecological risk assessments and restoration zoning. Priority areas were further identified through Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operators under varying decision-making preferences. The optimal threshold for watershed delineation was determined as 11.04 km 2 , resulting in 1513 refined sub-watershed units after correction, with 71.59% concentrated in the 10–50 km 2 range. A spatial analysis revealed an east-to-west gradient in ecosystem service distribution, where eastern regions consistently exhibited lower values compared to central and western areas. From 2015 to 2020, soil retention per unit area increased by 5.09%, while water purification for N and P showed marginal improvements of 0.97% and 0.39%, respectively. Conversely, water conservation declined significantly by 10.00%, with carbon sequestration and biodiversity protection experiencing slight reductions of 1.74% and 1.92%, all within a 2% variation margin. Ecological risk zoning identified low-risk areas (grades 1–3) predominantly in western and northeastern Dali, encompassing 1094 sub-watersheds (77.36% by count and 73.92% by area), while high-risk zones (grades 4–5) covered 386 units (26.08% by area). Integrating ecological quality and risk levels, the study area was classified into four functional zones: Zone I (high quality, high risk), Zone II (low quality, high risk), Zone III (low quality, low risk), and Zone IV (high quality, low risk). With increasing risk tolerance, the priority restoration areas expanded from eastward to central regions. Based on the scenario simulations under ecological priority, status quo, and development-oriented policies, the critical restoration areas include the Sangyuan River Basin, mid-reach of the Juli River, and upper Miyu River. This methodology provides a theoretical and technical foundation for ecosystem service enhancement and degraded ecosystem rehabilitation in Dali Prefecture and similar regions. Keywords: sub-watershed scale; ecosystem services; ecological restoration; Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operator; ecological risk (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1270-:d:1678053 Access Statistics for this article Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma More articles in Land from MDPI |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.