A Method for Identifying Key Areas of Ecological Restoration, Zoning Ecological Conservation, and Restoration

Shuaiqi Chen, Zhengzhou Ji and Longhui Lu ()
Additional contact information
Shuaiqi Chen: College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
Zhengzhou Ji: College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
Longhui Lu: Satellite Application Center for Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 7, 1-22

Abstract: Ecological security patterns (ESPs) are fundamental to safeguarding regional ecological integrity and enhancing human well-being. Consequently, research on conservation and restoration in critical regions is vital for ensuring ecological security and optimizing territorial ecological spatial configurations. Focusing on the Henan section of the Yellow River Basin, this study established the regional ESP and conservation–restoration framework through an integrated approach: (1) assessing four key ecosystem services—soil conservation, water retention, carbon sequestration, and habitat quality; (2) identifying ecological sources based on ecosystem service importance classification; (3) calculating a comprehensive resistance surface using the entropy weight method, incorporating key factors (land cover type, NDVI, topographic relief, and slope); (4) delineating ecological corridors and nodes using Linkage Mapper and the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) theory; and (5) integrating ecological functional zoning to synthesize the final spatial conservation and restoration strategy. Key findings reveal: (1) 20 ecological sources, totaling 8947 km 2 (20.9% of the study area), and 43 ecological corridors, spanning 778.24 km, were delineated within the basin. Nineteen ecological barriers (predominantly located in farmland, bare land, construction land, and low-coverage grassland) and twenty-one ecological pinch points (primarily clustered in forestland, grassland, water bodies, and wetlands) were identified. Collectively, these elements form the Henan section’s Ecological Security Pattern (ESP), integrating source areas, a corridor network, and key regional nodes for ecological conservation and restoration. (2) Building upon the ESP and the ecological baseline, and informed by ecological functional zoning, we identified a spatial framework for conservation and restoration characterized by “one axis, two cores, and multiple zones”. Tailored conservation and restoration strategies were subsequently proposed. This study provides critical data support for reconciling ecological security and economic development in the Henan Yellow River Basin, offering a scientific foundation and practical guidance for regional territorial spatial ecological restoration planning and implementation.

Keywords: importance of ecosystem services; identification of ecological source areas; ecological corridors; ecological protection and restoration zoning; Henan section of the Yellow River Basin (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1439/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1439/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1439-:d:1698742

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().