Multi-Objective Land Use Optimization Based on NSGA-II and PLUS Models: Balancing Economic Development and Carbon Neutrality Goals

Hanlong Gu, Shuoxin Liu, Chongyang Huan, Ming Cheng, Xiuru Dong () and Haohang Sun ()
Additional contact information
Hanlong Gu: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
Shuoxin Liu: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
Chongyang Huan: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
Ming Cheng: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
Xiuru Dong: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
Haohang Sun: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 8, 1-21

Abstract: Land use/land cover (LULC) change constitutes a critical driver influencing regional carbon cycling processes. Optimizing LULC structures represents a significant pathway toward the realization of carbon neutrality. This study takes Liaoning Province as a case area to analyze LULC changes from 2000 to 2020 and to assess their impacts on land use carbon emissions (LUCE) and ecosystem carbon storage (ECS). To accelerate the achievement of carbon neutrality, four development scenarios are established: natural development (ND), low-carbon emission (LCE), high-carbon storage (HCS), and carbon neutrality (CN). For each scenario, corresponding optimization objectives and constraint conditions are defined, and a multi-objective LULC optimization coupling model is formulated to optimize both the quantity structure and spatial pattern of LULC. On this basis, the model quantifies ECS and LUCE under the four scenarios and evaluates the economic value of each scenario and its contribution to the carbon neutrality target. Results indicate the following: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the extensive expansion of construction land resulted in a reduction in ECS by 12.72 × 10 6 t and an increase in LUCE by 150.44 × 10 6 t; (2) Compared to the ND scenario, the LCE scenario exhibited the most significant performance in controlling carbon emissions, while the HCS scenario achieved the highest increase in carbon sequestration. The CN scenario showed significant advantages in reducing LUCE, enhancing ECS, and promoting economic growth, achieving a reduction of 0.18 × 10 6 t in LUCE, an increase of 118.84 × 10 6 t in ECS, and an economic value gain of 3386.21 × 10 6 yuan. This study optimizes the LULC structure from the perspective of balancing economic development, LUCE reduction, and ECS enhancement. It addresses the inherent conflict between regional economic growth and ecological conservation, providing scientific evidence and policy insights for promoting LULC optimization and advancing carbon neutrality in similar regions.

Keywords: carbon neutral; carbon storage; carbon emissions; land use optimization; Liaoning Province (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1585/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1585/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1585-:d:1716628

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().