EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does the “Three Rights Separation” System Improve the Economic Efficiency of Rural Residential Land Use?—Evidence from Yujiang and Deqing, China

Yichi Zhang, Yingen Hu (), Min Wang and Hongyu Luo
Additional contact information
Yichi Zhang: School of Geography and Tourism, Qilu Normal University, Jinan 250200, China
Yingen Hu: Collage of Public Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Min Wang: School of Geography and Tourism, Qilu Normal University, Jinan 250200, China
Hongyu Luo: Collage of Public Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 9, 1-24

Abstract: The “three rights separation” system plays a vital role in enhancing the economic efficiency of rural residential land use, thereby contributing to land revitalization and rural-urban integration. Using survey data from 456 farmers in Yujiang District and Deqing County, this study employs DEA, Tobit, and threshold regression models to analyze the system’s effects. The results show that the system improves economic efficiency by approximately 8.9%, primarily by incentivizing investment and promoting land transfers. A nonlinear threshold effect exists: investment incentives become significant only when idle land exceeds 35 m 2 , consistent with farmers’ economic decision-making. Land transfers enhance efficiency via marginal return equalization, however, economies of scale are not evident, being constrained by legal and coordination factors. The findings highlight the importance of deepening reform implementation, enhancing farmers’ understanding of property rights, adopting differentiated incentives tailored to land size and farmer capacity, and regulating the land transfer market to ensure transparency and fairness. Furthermore, promoting collective or service-based management models can help overcome natural scale limitations, thereby unlocking the system’s full institutional dividends.

Keywords: “three rights separation” system; economic efficiency of rural residential land use; input incentives; rural residential land transfer (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1752/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1752/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1752-:d:1737274

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-08-30
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1752-:d:1737274