Who Is Most Responsible for the Mitigation of Climate Change? An Intercultural Study in Central Europe, Central Asia, and the Middle East

Anna Kwiatkowska (), Magdalena Mosanya, Patrycja Uram, Dilbar Urazbayeva, Baxtigul Nurullayeva, Vita Mikuličiūtė, Rūta Sargautytė and Konstantin Karpinskij
Additional contact information
Anna Kwiatkowska: Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1 Jaracza, 00-378 Warsaw, Poland
Magdalena Mosanya: Faculty of Psychology, Murdoch University, Level 1&2, Block 18, Dubai Knowledge Park, Dubai P.O. Box 500700, United Arab Emirates
Patrycja Uram: Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1 Jaracza, 00-378 Warsaw, Poland
Dilbar Urazbayeva: Department of Psychology, Manun University, Building 3, 110 Islam Karimov Str., Urgench 220100, Uzbekistan
Baxtigul Nurullayeva: Department of Psychology, Manun University, Building 3, 110 Islam Karimov Str., Urgench 220100, Uzbekistan
Vita Mikuličiūtė: Faculty of Philosophy, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Universiteto g., 01131 Vilnius, Lithuania
Rūta Sargautytė: Faculty of Philosophy, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Universiteto g., 01131 Vilnius, Lithuania
Konstantin Karpinskij: Department of Psychology, Manun University, Building 3, 110 Islam Karimov Str., Urgench 220100, Uzbekistan

Land, 2025, vol. 14, issue 9, 1-23

Abstract: Researchers observed that even if one’s environmental concern was high, people would delegate others to take responsibility for climate change mitigation and undertake sustainable actions. In this study, we explored how citizens of different countries in Central Europe, Central Asia, and the Middle East perceived responsibility for mitigating and reducing climate change consequences of various collective and individual agents. Also, we asked about the role of cultural values, environmental worldviews, and beliefs in the intractability of climate change in the prediction of the responsibility distribution. The total sample consisted of n = 1267 participants from Belarus, Lithuania, Poland, the United Arab Emirates, and Uzbekistan. We created the list of 11 collective and individual entities as accountable for mitigation and sustainable activities. We used the Collindex scale to measure collectivistic and individualistic values, the NEP scale to measure anthropocentric and ecocentric worldviews, and two questions concerning the intractability beliefs. Results showed that participants attributed more responsibility to collective agents than to individuals across countries. The predictors’ patterns indicated that ecocentric worldviews consistently increased perceived responsibility of both collective and individual actors, whereas anthropocentrism reduced the attribution of collectives’ responsibility. Collectivistic values appeared to foster greater expectations of individuals. Also, differences between national samples were observed.

Keywords: climate change; mitigation; cultural values; new environmental paradigm; intractability; cross-cultural study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1914/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1914/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1914-:d:1753730

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().