Short-Term Projects versus Adaptive Governance: Conflicting Demands in the Management of Ecological Restoration
Ian Hodge () and
William M. Adams ()
Additional contact information
William M. Adams: Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK
Land, 2016, vol. 5, issue 4, 1-17
Drawing on a survey of large-scale ecological restoration initiatives, we find that managers face contradictory demands. On the one hand, they have to raise funds from a variety of sources through competitive procedures for individual projects. These projects require the specification of deliverable outputs within a relatively short project period. On the other hand, ecologists argue that the complexity of ecosystem processes means that it is not possible to know how to deliver predetermined outcomes and that governance should be adaptive, long-term and implemented through networks of stakeholders. This debate parallels a debate in public administration between New Public Management and more recent proposals for a new approach, sometimes termed Public Value Management. Both of these approaches have strengths. Projectification provides control and accountability to funders. Adaptive governance recognises complexity and provides for long-term learning, building networks and adaptive responses. We suggest an institutional architecture that aims to capture the major benefits of each approach based on public support dedicated to ecological restoration and long-term funding programmes.
Keywords: ecological restoration; biodiversity conservation; adaptive governance; projectification; New Public Management; Public Value Management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:5:y:2016:i:4:p:39-:d:82544
Access Statistics for this article
Land is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Andrew Millington
More articles in Land from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().