EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Water Rights on Community Lands: LandMark’s Findings from 100 Countries

Liz Alden Wily, Fabrice Dubertret, Peter Veit, Katie Reytar and Nicholas K. Tagliarino
Additional contact information
Liz Alden Wily: Van Vollenhoven Institute, Leiden Law School, Box 9520, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Fabrice Dubertret: Université Paris 3-Sorbonne Nouvelle, IHEAL, CREDA–UMR 7227, 75007 Paris, France
Peter Veit: World Resources Institute, Washington, DC 20002, USA
Katie Reytar: World Resources Institute, Washington, DC 20002, USA
Nicholas K. Tagliarino: Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands

Land, 2017, vol. 6, issue 4, 1-18

Abstract: This paper analyzes whether national laws acknowledge indigenous peoples and other rural communities in 100 countries as owners of waters that arise within their lands. Results derive from information collected by LandMark to score the legal status of community land tenure. Findings are positive; half of all countries recognize communities as lawful possessors of water on their lands. Three quarters permit communities to manage the distribution and use of water on their lands. While 71 percent of countries declare water to be a public resource, this belies the substantial existence of privately owned water. In 29 percent of countries, private water is an identified legal category, and in many other countries obtainable rights to water are sufficiently substantial to imply lawful possession. Communities are beneficiaries mainly where customary rights are accorded status as property rights, or where ownership of public lands and water are devolved to rural collectives. However, opposite trends of nationalization and regulation of water suggest that while legal recognition of community land ownership may rise in the future, this will not necessarily include waters on the land. Irrespective of tenure, rural communities in 72 of 77 countries (93.5 percent) are legally assured access to water for domestic purposes. This is consistent with the rising definition of safe drinking water as a human right, although access does not necessarily come free of cost.

Keywords: inland water; community water rights; community lands; public property; private property (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/4/77/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/4/77/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:77-:d:117549

Access Statistics for this article

Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma

More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:77-:d:117549