Quantifying Land Use in Past Societies from Cultural Practice and Archaeological Data
Ryan E. Hughes,
Erika Weiberg,
Anton Bonnier,
Martin Finné and
Jed O. Kaplan
Additional contact information
Ryan E. Hughes: Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Erika Weiberg: Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
Anton Bonnier: Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
Martin Finné: Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
Jed O. Kaplan: ARVE Research Sàrl, 1009 Pully, Switzerland
Land, 2018, vol. 7, issue 1, 1-21
Abstract:
Quantitative reconstructions of past land use facilitate comparisons between livelihoods in space and time. However, comparison between different types of land use strategies is challenging as land use has a multitude of expressions and intensities. The quantitative method presented here facilitates the exploration and synthetization of uneven archaeological and textual evidence from past societies. The approach quantifies the area required for habitation, agriculture, arboriculture, pasturage, and fuel supply, based on a combination of archaeological, historical, ethnographic and modern evidence from the relevant geographical region. It is designed to stimulate discussion and can be used to test a wide range of hypotheses regarding local and regional economies, ancient trade and redistribution, and the resilience and/or vulnerability of past societies to environmental change. The method also helps identify where our gaps in knowledge are in understanding past human–environment interaction, the ecological footprint of past cultures and their influence on the landscape in a transparent and quantitative manner. The present article focuses especially on the impact of dietary estimates and crop yield estimates, two main elements in calculating land use in past societies due to their uncertainty as well as their significant impact on calculations. By employing archaeological data, including botanical, zoological and isotopic evidence, alongside available textual sources, this method seeks to improve land use and land cover change models by increasing their representativeness and accuracy.
Keywords: agriculture; pasture; woodlot; population; subsistence; land use; archaeology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/1/9/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/1/9/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:9-:d:127180
Access Statistics for this article
Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma
More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().