Expansion of Commercial Sugarcane Cultivation among Smallholder Farmers in Uganda: Implications for Household Food Security
Edward N. Mwavu,
Vettes K. Kalema,
Fred Bateganya,
Patrick Byakagaba,
Daniel Waiswa,
Thomas Enuru and
Michael S. Mbogga
Additional contact information
Edward N. Mwavu: School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
Vettes K. Kalema: Kachwekano Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute, P.O. Box 421, Kabale, Uganda
Fred Bateganya: College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
Patrick Byakagaba: School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
Daniel Waiswa: School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
Thomas Enuru: School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
Michael S. Mbogga: School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
Land, 2018, vol. 7, issue 2, 1-15
Abstract:
Understanding the impact of commercial agriculture in the face of global change is critical to support strategies that ensure food security and alleviate poverty among households. We assessed the contribution of commercial sugarcane cultivation to household-level food security among smallholder farmers in Busoga sub-region, eastern Uganda. Land use changes are motivated by quick commercial gains rather than sustained food production; a situation that influences food security. The majority of households cultivate few crop varieties, lack adequate and nutritious foods, and have inadequate income to purchase food to meet their needs. Inadequacy of food within some commercial sugarcane-cultivating households suggests that generating income does not necessarily increase food security. To cope with food insecurity, households offer labour in exchange for food, borrow food, ration food, and at times steal. This is exacerbated by increasing food crop failures, large family sizes, trade in food items, and declining availability of food and land for food production. Commercial sugarcane cultivation is the main driver of food insecurity but given its perceived economic benefits, future sugarcane plantations expansion in the region is probably inevitable. Therefore, future policy should be designed to provide triple-win strategies (i.e., food security, poverty alleviation, and climate change adaptation) that provide sustainable livelihoods.
Keywords: poverty alleviation; sustainable livelihoods; climate change; commercial agriculture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q15 Q2 Q24 Q28 Q5 R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/2/73/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/2/73/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlands:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:73-:d:151892
Access Statistics for this article
Land is currently edited by Ms. Carol Ma
More articles in Land from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().